Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306444›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2016

Evaluation and treatment of failed shoulder instability procedures.

Anthony G Ho, Ashok L Gowda, J Michael Wiater

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Arthroscopic Bankart repair: A matched cohort comparison of the modified Mason Allen method and the simple stitch method.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony G HoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, 3535 W. Thirteen Mile Rd, Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
Ashok L GowdaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, 3535 W. Thirteen Mile Rd, Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
J Michael WiaterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, 3535 W. Thirteen Mile Rd, Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. J.Michael.Wiater@Beaumont.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of the unstable shoulder after a failed stabilization procedure can be difficult and challenging. Detailed understanding of the native shoulder anatomy, including its static and dynamic restraints, is necessary for determining the patient's primary pathology. In addition, evaluation of the patient's history, physical exam, and imaging is important for identifying the cause for failure after the initial procedure. Common mistakes include under-appreciation of bony defects, failure to recognize capsular laxity, technical errors, and missed associated pathology. Many potential treatment options exist for revision surgery, including open or arthroscopic Bankart repair, bony augmentation procedures, and management of Hill Sachs defects. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss in-depth the common risk factors for post-surgical failure, components for appropriate evaluation, and the different surgical options available for revision stabilization. Level of evidence Level V.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyArthroscopyHumansJoint InstabilityRange of Motion, ArticularRecurrenceReoperationRisk FactorsShoulder DislocationEvaluationFailedInstabilityShoulderTreatment

Identifiers

PMID27306444
PMCPMC4999377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.