ReviewLung2016
Oxygen Sensing in Early Life.
Review in Lung, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are pulmonary neuroepithelial bodies sensors for acute airway hypoxia implicated in the central regulation of breathing?PloS one · 2026Article
- The Effect of Initial Oxygen Exposure on Diaphragm Activity in Preterm Infants at Birth.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Hypoxia and aging.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2019Review
- Oxygen therapy of the newborn from molecular understanding to clinical practice.Pediatric research · 2019Review
- Role of Prenatal Hypoxia in Brain Development, Cognitive Functions, and Neurodegeneration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From birth, animals should possess functional machinery to appropriately regulate its respiration. This machinery has to detect the available oxygen quantity in order to efficiently modulate breathing movements in accordance with body requirements. The chemosensitivity process responsible for this detection is known to be mainly performed by carotid bodies. However, pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, which are mainly gathered in neuroepithelial bodies, also present the capability to exert chemosensitivity. The goal of this article is to put in perspective the potential complementarity in the activity of these two peripheral chemosensors in the context of neonatal oxygen chemosensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.