Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306201›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2016

[Molecular imaging in neurological diseases].

M Reimold, C la Fougère

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ReimoldAbteilung Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Department Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 14, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
C la FougèreAbteilung Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Department Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 14, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. christian.lafougere@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neurodegeneration and in neuro-oncology, the standard imaging procedure, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), shows limited sensitivity and specificity. Molecular imaging with specific positron-emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracers allows various molecular targets and metabolic processes to be assessed and is thus a valuable adjunct to MRI. Two important examples are referred to here: amino acid transport for neuro-oncological issues, and the recently approved PET tracers for detecting amyloid depositions during the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease. This review discusses the clinical relevance and indications for the following nuclear medicine imaging procedures: amyloid PET, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, and dopamine transporter (DaT)-SPECT for the diagnosis of dementia and the differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, in addition to amino acid PET for the diagnosis of brain tumors and somatostatin receptor imaging in meningioma.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMolecular ImagingNeurodegenerative DiseasesRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, Emission-ComputedBiomarkersRadiopharmaceuticalsGliomaMeningiomaMultimodal imagingNeurodegenerative diseasesRadioactive tracers

Identifiers

PMID27306201
OpenAlexW2462450579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.