Trial reportInternational clinical psychopharmacology2016
Ziprasidone augmentation for anxious depression.
Trial report in International clinical psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The Role of Norepinephrine and Its α-Adrenergic Receptors in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previously, we found an anxiolytic effect of ziprasidone augmentation to escitalopram (compared with placebo augmentation) in patients with depression in an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Here, we carried out a post-hoc analysis, comparing changes in the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating Scales between patients with anxious depression versus nonanxious depression, using a moderator analysis. Hamilton Depression Rating Scales total change scores from baseline and endpoint were not significantly different (interaction term P=0.91) in patients with anxious depression on ziprasidone augmentation (n=19; -9.1±4.9) or placebo (n=19; -6.1±8.9) versus patients without anxious depression on ziprasidone (n=52; -5.5±6.7) or placebo (n=49; -2.3±4.5). There was a trend toward statistical significance (interaction term P=0.1) in favor of patients without anxious depression for a difference in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total change scores from baseline to endpoint [patients with anxious depression on ziprasidone augmentation (n=19; -2.7±5.3) or placebo (n=19; -3.3±5.8) versus patients without anxious depression on ziprasidone (n=51; -3.9±6.6) or placebo (n=44; -0.9±4.7)]. Ziprasidone augmentation was equally efficacious in treating depression in patients with versus without anxious depression. However, the observed anxiolytic effect for patients with higher anxiety was not clinically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.