Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27305897›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2016

Revealing the combined effects of lactulose and probiotic enterococci on the swine faecal microbiota using 454 pyrosequencing.

Jong Pyo Chae, Edward Alain B Pajarillo, Ju Kyoung Oh, Heebal Kim, Dae-Kyung Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Gut microbial shifts by synbiotic combination ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jong Pyo ChaeDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 330-714, Korea.
Edward Alain B PajarilloDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 330-714, Korea.
Ju Kyoung OhDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 330-714, Korea.
Heebal KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Korea.
Dae-Kyung KangDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 330-714, Korea.
Dankook University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demand for the development of non-antibiotic growth promoters in animal production has increased in recent years. This report compared the faecal microbiota of weaned piglets under the administration of a basal diet (CON) or that containing prebiotic lactulose (LAC), probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11181 (PRO) or their synbiotic combination (SYN). At the phylum level, the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio increased in the treatment groups compared with the CON group, and the lowest proportion of Proteobacteria was observed in the LAC group. At the family level, Enterobacteriaceae decreased in all treatments; more than a 10-fold reduction was observed in the LAC (0.99%) group compared with the CON group. At the genus level, the highest Oscillibacter proportion was detected in PRO, the highest Clostridium in LAC and the highest Lactobacillus in SYN; the abundance of Escherichia was lowest in the LAC group. Clustering in the discriminant analysis of principal components revealed distinct separation of the feeding groups (CON, LAC, PRO and SYN), showing different microbial compositions according to different feed additives or their combination. These results suggest that individual materials and their combination have unique actions and independent mechanisms for changes in the distal gut microbiota.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotaEnterococcus faeciumFecesFood AdditivesGastrointestinal AgentsLactuloseProbioticsSequence Analysis, DNASwineFood AdditivesGastrointestinal AgentsLactulose

Identifiers

PMID27305897
PMCPMC4919990
OpenAlexW2423361801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.