ArticleJournal of vision2016
Space-by-time manifold representation of dynamic facial expressions for emotion categorization.
Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct temporal features of genuine and deliberate facial expressions of surprise.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Spatiotemporal dynamics and substates underlie emotional signalling in facial movements.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A reverse hierarchy theory of social perception.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Facial expression recognition through muscle synergies and estimation of facial keypoint displacements through a skin-musculoskeletal model using facial sEMG signals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Louder Call for the Integration of Multiple Nonverbal Channels in the Study of Affect.Affective science · 2024Article
- Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Understanding Naturalistic Facial Expressions with Deep Learning and Multimodal Large Language Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Testing, explaining, and exploring models of facial expressions of emotions.Science advances · 2023Article
- What is missing in the study of emotion expression?Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- NetFACS: Using network science to understand facial communication systems.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- The role of movement kinematics in facial emotion expression production and recognition.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Computational Models of Emotion Inference in Theory of Mind: A Review and Roadmap.Topics in cognitive science · 2019Review
- Accuracy of Rats in Discriminating Visual Objects Is Explained by the Complexity of Their Perceptual Strategy.Current biology : CB · 2018Article
- Use and Usefulness of Dynamic Face Stimuli for Face Perception Studies-a Review of Behavioral Findings and Methodology.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrections.2016
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual categorization is the brain computation that reduces high-dimensional information in the visual environment into a smaller set of meaningful categories. An important problem in visual neuroscience is to identify the visual information that the brain must represent and then use to categorize visual inputs. Here we introduce a new mathematical formalism-termed space-by-time manifold decomposition-that describes this information as a low-dimensional manifold separable in space and time. We use this decomposition to characterize the representations used by observers to categorize the six classic facial expressions of emotion (happy, surprise, fear, disgust, anger, and sad). By means of a Generative Face Grammar, we presented random dynamic facial movements on each experimental trial and used subjective human perception to identify the facial movements that correlate with each emotion category. When the random movements projected onto the categorization manifold region corresponding to one of the emotion categories, observers categorized the stimulus accordingly; otherwise they selected "other." Using this information, we determined both the Action Unit and temporal components whose linear combinations lead to reliable categorization of each emotion. In a validation experiment, we confirmed the psychological validity of the resulting space-by-time manifold representation. Finally, we demonstrated the importance of temporal sequencing for accurate emotion categorization and identified the temporal dynamics of Action Unit components that cause typical confusions between specific emotions (e.g., fear and surprise) as well as those resolving these confusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.