Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27305142›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparative Study of Extracellular Vesicles from the Urine of Healthy Individuals and Prostate Cancer Patients.

Olga E Bryzgunova, Marat M Zaripov, Tatyana E Skvortsova, Evgeny A Lekchnov, Alina E Grigor'eva, Ivan A Zaporozhchenko, Evgeny S Morozkin, Elena I Ryabchikova, Yuri B Yurchenko, Vladimir E Voitsitskiy and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Urinary microRNAs expression in prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The oncobiome; what, so what, now what?Microbiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Progress of Exosomal LncRNAs in Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Olga E BryzgunovaLaboratory of molecular medicine, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Marat M ZaripovDispensary department 2, Novosibirsk Regional Oncology Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Tatyana E SkvortsovaLaboratory of molecular medicine, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Evgeny A LekchnovLaboratory of molecular medicine, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Alina E Grigor'evaGroup of microscopy, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Ivan A ZaporozhchenkoLaboratory of molecular medicine, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9101-2207
Evgeny S MorozkinLaboratory of molecular medicine, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Elena I RyabchikovaGroup of microscopy, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Yuri B YurchenkoCenter of New Medical Technologies of ICBFM SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Vladimir E VoitsitskiyDispensary department 2, Novosibirsk Regional Oncology Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Pavel P LaktionovLaboratory of molecular medicine, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine CD RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that extracellular vesicles may be the key to timely diagnosis and monitoring of genito-urological malignancies. In this study we investigated the composition and content of extracellular vesicles found in the urine of healthy donors and prostate cancer patients. Urine of 14 PCa patients and 20 healthy volunteers was clarified by low-speed centrifugation and total extracellular vesicles fraction was obtain by high-speed centrifugation. The exosome-enriched fraction was obtained by filtration of total extracellular vesicles through a 0.1 μm pore filter. Transmission electron microscopy showed that cell-free urine in both groups contained vesicles from 20 to 230 nm. Immunogold staining after ultrafiltration demonstrated that 95% and 90% of extracellular vesicles in healthy individuals and cancer patients, respectively, were exosomes. Protein, DNA and RNA concentrations as well as size distribution of extracellular vesicles in both fractions were analyzed. Only 75% of the total protein content of extracellular vesicles was associated with exosomes which amounted to 90-95% of all vesicles. Median DNA concentrations in total extracellular vesicles and exosome-enriched fractions were 18 pg/ml and 2.6 pg/ml urine, correspondingly. Urine extracellular vesicles carried a population of RNA molecules 25 nt to 200 nt in concentration of no more than 290 pg/ml of urine. Additionally, concentrations of miR-19b, miR-25, miR-125b, and miR-205 were quantified by qRT-PCR. MiRNAs were shown to be differently distributed between different fractions of extracellular vesicles. Detection of miR-19b versus miR-16 in total vesicles and exosome-enriched fractions achieved 100%/93% and 95%/79% specificity/sensitivity in distinguishing cancer patients from healthy individuals, respectively, demonstrating the diagnostic value of urine extracellular vesicles.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCentrifugationDNA, NeoplasmExosomesExtracellular VesiclesHumansMaleMicroRNAsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsProstatic NeoplasmsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, NeoplasmSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, NeoplasmMicroRNAsMIRN16 microRNA, humanMIRN19A microRNA, humanNeoplasm ProteinsRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID27305142
PMCPMC4909321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.