Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27304504›Full record

ReviewCell metabolism2016

Sex Differences in Lifespan.

Steven N Austad, Kathleen E Fischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell metabolism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 355 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
355citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

355 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 575 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. eLife · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex-Related Effect of Chronic Doses of Warfarin and Menadione onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. The association of frailty with age and lifespan in mice differs by strain and sex.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

295 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven N AustadDepartment of Biology and Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of Aging, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, USA. Electronic address: austad@uab.edu.
Kathleen E FischerDepartment of Biology and Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of Aging, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
Sex hormones and arthritis in a long lived animal modelP30AG050886 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Jianhua Zhang · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
ENERGETICS DISPARITIES & LIFESPAN: A UNIFIED HYPOTHESISR01AG043972 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLISON, DAVID B · 2012 to 2016
$8.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG050886NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043972NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in longevity can provide insights into novel mechanisms of aging, yet they have been little studied. Surprisingly, sex-specific longevity patterns are best known in wild animals. Evolutionary hypotheses accounting for longevity patterns in natural populations include differential vulnerability to environmental hazards, differential intensity of sexual selection, and distinct patterns of parental care. Mechanistic hypotheses focus on hormones, asymmetric inheritance of sex chromosomes and mitochondria. Virtually all intensively studied species show conditional sex differences in longevity. Humans are the only species in which one sex is known to have a ubiquitous survival advantage. Paradoxically, although women live longer, they suffer greater morbidity particularly late in life. This mortality-morbidity paradox may be a consequence of greater connective tissue responsiveness to sex hormones in women. Human females' longevity advantage may result from hormonal influences on inflammatory and immunological responses, or greater resistance to oxidative damage; current support for these mechanisms is weak.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHumansLongevityMaleMammals

Identifiers

PMID27304504
PMCPMC4932837
OpenAlexW2436467819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.