Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303789›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Antifungal Activity of Amphotericin B Conjugated to Nanosized Magnetite in the Treatment of Paracoccidioidomycosis.

Camila Arruda Saldanha, Mônica Pereira Garcia, Diego Cesar Iocca, Luciana Guilherme Rebelo, Ana Camila Oliveira Souza, Anamélia Lorenzetti Bocca, Maria de Fátima Menezes Almeida Santos, Paulo Cesar Morais, Ricardo Bentes Azevedo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One Century of Study: What We Learned aboutJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Arruda SaldanhaUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Mônica Pereira GarciaUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Diego Cesar IoccaUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Luciana Guilherme RebeloUniversidade Estadual de Goiás, Unidade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil.
Ana Camila Oliveira SouzaUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Celular, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Anamélia Lorenzetti BoccaUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Celular, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Maria de Fátima Menezes Almeida SantosUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Paulo Cesar MoraisUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Física, Núcleo de Física Aplicada, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Ricardo Bentes AzevedoUniversidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Estadual de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports on in vitro and in vivo tests that sought to assess the antifungal activity of a newly developed magnetic carrier system comprising amphotericin B loaded onto the surface of pre-coated (with a double-layer of lauric acid) magnetite nanoparticles. The in vitro tests compared two drugs; i.e., this newly developed form and free amphotericin B. We found that this nanocomplex exhibited antifungal activity without cytotoxicity to human urinary cells and with low cytotoxicity to peritoneal macrophages. We also evaluated the efficacy of the nanocomplex in experimental paracoccidioidomycosis. BALB/c mice were intratracheally infected with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and treated with the compound for 30 or 60 days beginning the day after infection. The newly developed amphotericin B coupled with magnetic nanoparticles was effective against experimental paracoccidioidomycosis, and it did not induce clinical, biochemical or histopathological alterations. The nanocomplex also did not induce genotoxic effects in bone marrow cells. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that amphotericin B coupled to magnetic nanoparticles and stabilized with bilayer lauric acid is a promising nanotool for the treatment of the experimental paracoccidioidomycosis because it exhibited antifungal activity that was similar to that of free amphotericin B, did not induce adverse effects in therapeutic doses and allowed for a reduction in the number of applications.

Indexed as

Alanine TransaminaseAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesCreatinineDrug CarriersFemaleFerrosoferric OxideMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanoparticlesParacoccidioidesParacoccidioidomycosisUreaAlanine TransaminaseAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesCreatinineDrug CarriersFerrosoferric OxideUrea

Identifiers

PMID27303789
PMCPMC4909273
OpenAlexW2421985213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.