Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303734›Full record

ArticlemSphere

Artificial Seawater Media Facilitate Cultivating Members of the Microbial Majority from the Gulf of Mexico.

Michael W Henson, David M Pitre, Jessica Lee Weckhorst, V Celeste Lanclos, Austen T Webber, J Cameron Thrash

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Plant growth-promoting traits ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael W HensonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-797X
David M PitreDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Jessica Lee WeckhorstDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
V Celeste LanclosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Austen T WebberDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
J Cameron ThrashDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0896-9986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput cultivation studies have been successful at bringing numerous important marine bacterioplankton lineages into culture, yet these frequently utilize natural seawater media that can hamper portability, reproducibility, and downstream characterization efforts. Here we report the results of seven experiments with a set of newly developed artificial seawater media and evaluation of cultivation success via comparison with community sequencing data from the inocula. Eighty-two new isolates represent highly important marine clades, including SAR116, OM60/NOR5, SAR92, Roseobacter, and SAR11. For many, isolation with an artificial seawater medium is unprecedented, and several organisms are also the first of their type from the Gulf of Mexico. Community analysis revealed that many isolates were among the 20 most abundant organisms in their source inoculum. This method will expand the accessibility of bacterioplankton cultivation experiments and improve repeatability by avoiding normal compositional changes in natural seawater. IMPORTANCE The difficulty in cultivating many microbial taxa vexes researchers intent on understanding the contributions of these organisms to natural systems, particularly when these organisms are numerically abundant, and many cultivation attempts recover only rare taxa. Efforts to improve this conundrum with marine bacterioplankton have been successful with natural seawater media, but that approach suffers from a number of drawbacks and there have been no comparable artificial alternatives created in the laboratory. This work demonstrates that a newly developed suite of artificial-seawater media can successfully cultivate many of the most abundant taxa from seawater samples and many taxa previously only cultivated with natural-seawater media. This methodology therefore significantly simplifies efforts to cultivate bacterioplankton and greatly improves our ability to perform physiological characterization of cultures postisolation.

Indexed as

artificial seawatercoastal microbiologyGulf of Mexicohigh-throughput culturingmarine microbiologySAR11

Identifiers

PMID27303734
PMCPMC4894692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.