ArticlemSphere
SSTAR, a Stand-Alone Easy-To-Use Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Predictor.
Article in mSphere. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational paradigms for antimicrobial resistance prediction: integrating multi-omics, structural modeling, and foundation artificial intelligence systems.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Interpreting antimicrobial resistance from bacterial whole-genome sequencing: prediction tools, database fragmentation, analytical trade-offs, and harmonized reporting.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Comparative assessment of annotation tools reveals critical antimicrobial resistance knowledge gaps in Klebsiella pneumoniae.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiscale comparative pathogenomic analysis of Vibrio anguillarum linking serotype diversity, genomic plasticity and pathogenicity.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Pathogenomic Insights intoAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Benchmarking pangenome dynamics and horizontal gene transfer inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Assessing computational predictions of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes from microbial genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Hound: a novel tool for automated mapping of genotype to phenotype in bacterial genomes assembled de novo.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Resistome: Permanent and Transient Antibiotic Resistance, an Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- First report of aFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Mutation Analysis in Regulator DNA-Binding Regions for Antimicrobial Efflux Pumps in 17,000Microorganisms · 2023Article
- The challenges of the genome-based identification of antifungal resistance in the clinical routine.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Detection of Acquired Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Domestic Pig (Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review and Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Databases.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Identification of Promoter Region Markers Associated With Altered Expression of Resistance-Nodulation-Division Antibiotic Efflux Pumps inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Antibiotic resistance: Global health crisis and metagenomics.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Multispecies Outbreak of Verona Integron-Encoded Metallo-ß-Lactamase-Producing Multidrug Resistant Bacteria Driven by a Promiscuous Incompatibility Group A/C2 Plasmid.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Antibiotic resistance: Time of synthesis in a post-genomic age.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- The Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of Noncarbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-ResistantOpen forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
- PARGT: a software tool for predicting antimicrobial resistance in bacteria.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the easy-to-use Sequence Search Tool for Antimicrobial Resistance, SSTAR. It combines a locally executed BLASTN search against a customizable database with an intuitive graphical user interface for identifying antimicrobial resistance (AR) genes from genomic data. Although the database is initially populated from a public repository of acquired resistance determinants (i.e., ARG-ANNOT), it can be customized for particular pathogen groups and resistance mechanisms. For instance, outer membrane porin sequences associated with carbapenem resistance phenotypes can be added, and known intrinsic mechanisms can be included. Unique about this tool is the ability to easily detect putative new alleles and truncated versions of existing AR genes. Variants and potential new alleles are brought to the attention of the user for further investigation. For instance, SSTAR is able to identify modified or truncated versions of porins, which may be of great importance in carbapenemase-negative carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. SSTAR is written in Java and is therefore platform independent and compatible with both Windows and Unix operating systems. SSTAR and its manual, which includes a simple installation guide, are freely available from https://github.com/tomdeman-bio/Sequence-Search-Tool-for-Antimicrobial-Resistance-SSTAR-. IMPORTANCE Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is quickly becoming a routine method for identifying genes associated with antimicrobial resistance (AR). However, for many microbiologists, the use and analysis of WGS data present a substantial challenge. We developed SSTAR, software with a graphical user interface that enables the identification of known AR genes from WGS and has the unique capacity to easily detect new variants of known AR genes, including truncated protein variants. Current software solutions do not notify the user when genes are truncated and, therefore, likely nonfunctional, which makes phenotype predictions less accurate. SSTAR users can apply any AR database of interest as a reference comparator and can manually add genes that impact resistance, even if such genes are not resistance determinants per se (e.g., porins and efflux pumps).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.