Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303672›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2016

Next-Generation Sequencing in Post-mortem Genetic Testing of Young Sudden Cardiac Death Cases.

Najim Lahrouchi, Elijah R Behr, Connie R Bezzina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Autopsy of all young sudden death cases is important to increase survival in family members left behind.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetics of inherited cardiomyopathies in Africa.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical and genetic evaluation after sudden cardiac arrest.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Najim LahrouchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Heart Center, AMC , Amsterdam , Netherlands.
Elijah R BehrCardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's University of London , London , UK.
Connie R BezzinaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Heart Center, AMC , Amsterdam , Netherlands.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/71/28918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young (<40 years) occurs in the setting of a variety of rare inherited cardiac disorders and is a disastrous event for family members. Establishing the cause of SCD is important as it permits the pre-symptomatic identification of relatives at risk of SCD. Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS) is defined as SCD in the setting of negative autopsy findings and toxicological analysis. In such cases, reaching a diagnosis is even more challenging and post-mortem genetic testing can crucially contribute to the identification of the underlying cause of death. In this review, we will discuss the current achievements of "the molecular autopsy" in young SADS cases and provide an overview of key challenges in assessing pathogenicity (i.e., causality) of genetic variants identified through next-generation sequencing.

Indexed as

cardiomyopathychannelopathymolecular autopsynext-generation sequencingpost-mortem genetic testingsudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID27303672
PMCPMC4885007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.