ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience2016
Evaluation of Berlin Questionnaire Validity for Sleep Apnea Risk in Sleep Clinic Populations.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2022Pooled it
- Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Structured literature review of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in adult tonsillectomy or tonsillotomy.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017Guideline
- Prevalence of Insomnia, Nightmares and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The relationship between clinical severity of obstructive sleep apnea based on polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy with 3D, 2D, linear, and angular anatomical parameters of upper airway and craniofacial area in CBCTs of individuals with moderate or severe apnea: a cross-sectional study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- PTSD Symptom Severity Associated With Sleep Disturbances in Military Personnel: Evidence From a Prospective Controlled Study With Ecological Recordings.Depression and anxiety · 2025Observational
- Validation of a Portable Respiratory Monitoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Crossectional Study.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: An Extended and Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.International journal of preventive medicine · 2024Review
- The association between OSA and glycemic control in diabetes.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Sleep Disturbances Before Pregnancy and Subsequent Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Nature and science of sleep · 2022Article
- Predictive value of sleep apnea screenings in cardiac surgery patients.Sleep medicine · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Saudi Pilots.Nature and science of sleep · 2021Article
- Review
- Clinical Characteristics of Type 2 Diabetics Who are at High Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2018Article
- Comparison of Predictor of Desaturation Disorders and Daytime Sleepiness Based On Epworth Sleepiness Scale and STOP-BANG Questionnaires in Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018Article
- Screening Questionnaires for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Updated Systematic Review.Oman medical journal · 2018Review
- Sleepiness, occlusion, dental arch and palatal dimensions in children attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2018Article
- Comparison of Berlin Questionnaire, STOP-Bang, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Persian Patients.International journal of preventive medicine · 2018Article
- The Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis Perspective.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Berlin questionnaire (BQ) is a common tool to screen for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in the general population, but its application in the clinical sleep setting is still challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the BQ compared to the apnea-hypopnea index obtained from polysomnography recordings obtained from a sleep clinic in Iran.
methodsWe recruited 100 patients who were referred to the Sleep Disorders Research Center of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for the evaluation of suspected sleep-disorder breathing difficulties. Patients completed a Persian version of BQ and underwent one night of PSG. For each patient, Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was calculated to assess the diagnosis and severity of OSA. Severity of OSA was categorized as mild when AHI was between 5 and 15, moderate when it was between 15 and 30, and severe when it was more than 30.
resultsBQ results categorized 65% of our patients as high risk and 35% as low risk for OSA. The sensitivity and the specificity of BQ for OSA diagnosis with AHI>5 were 77.3% and 23.1%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 68.0% and negative predictive value was 22.0%. Moreover, the area under curve was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.49 - 0.67, P=0.38). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggested that BQ, despite its advantages in the general population, is not a precise tool to determine the risk of sleep apnea in the clinical setting, particularly in the sleep clinic population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27303598PMC4892329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.