Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303436›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2016

Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Selection for Bacterial Cold Water Disease Resistance Using Progeny Performance Data in Rainbow Trout: Insights on Genotyping Methods and Genomic Prediction Models.

Roger L Vallejo, Timothy D Leeds, Breno O Fragomeni, Guangtu Gao, Alvaro G Hernandez, Ignacy Misztal, Timothy J Welch, Gregory D Wiens, Yniv Palti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning for genomic selection of aquatic animals.Marine life science & technology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic Selection in Aquaculture Species.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roger L VallejoNational Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Timothy D LeedsNational Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Breno O FragomeniAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia Athens, GA, USA.
Guangtu GaoNational Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Alvaro G HernandezHigh-Throughput Sequencing and Genotyping Unit, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL, USA.
Ignacy MisztalAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia Athens, GA, USA.
Timothy J WelchNational Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Gregory D WiensNational Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Yniv PaltiNational Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Kearneysville, WV, USA.
National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial cold water disease (BCWD) causes significant economic losses in salmonid aquaculture, and traditional family-based breeding programs aimed at improving BCWD resistance have been limited to exploiting only between-family variation. We used genomic selection (GS) models to predict genomic breeding values (GEBVs) for BCWD resistance in 10 families from the first generation of the NCCCWA BCWD resistance breeding line, compared the predictive ability (PA) of GEBVs to pedigree-based estimated breeding values (EBVs), and compared the impact of two SNP genotyping methods on the accuracy of GEBV predictions. The BCWD phenotypes survival days (DAYS) and survival status (STATUS) had been recorded in training fish (n = 583) subjected to experimental BCWD challenge. Training fish, and their full sibs without phenotypic data that were used as parents of the subsequent generation, were genotyped using two methods: restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing and the Rainbow Trout Axiom® 57 K SNP array (Chip). Animal-specific GEBVs were estimated using four GS models: BayesB, BayesC, single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), and weighted ssGBLUP (wssGBLUP). Family-specific EBVs were estimated using pedigree and phenotype data in the training fish only. The PA of EBVs and GEBVs was assessed by correlating mean progeny phenotype (MPP) with mid-parent EBV (family-specific) or GEBV (animal-specific). The best GEBV predictions were similar to EBV with PA values of 0.49 and 0.46 vs. 0.50 and 0.41 for DAYS and STATUS, respectively. Among the GEBV prediction methods, ssGBLUP consistently had the highest PA. The RAD genotyping platform had GEBVs with similar PA to those of GEBVs from the Chip platform. The PA of ssGBLUP and wssGBLUP methods was higher with the Chip, but for BayesB and BayesC methods it was higher with the RAD platform. The overall GEBV accuracy in this study was low to moderate, likely due to the small training sample used. This study explored the potential of GS for improving resistance to BCWD in rainbow trout using, for the first time, progeny testing data to assess the accuracy of GEBVs, and it provides the basis for further investigation on the implementation of GS in commercial rainbow trout populations.

Indexed as

bacterial cold water diseaseBayesian methodsdisease resistancegenomic selectionrainbow troutsingle-step GBLUP

Identifiers

PMID27303436
PMCPMC4883007
OpenAlexW2407449780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.