Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303434›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2016

Logical Modeling and Dynamical Analysis of Cellular Networks.

Wassim Abou-Jaoudé, Pauline Traynard, Pedro T Monteiro, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Tomáš Helikar, Denis Thieffry, Claudine Chaouiya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Automated model refinement using perturbation-observation pairs.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Machine learning to dissect perturbations in complex cellular systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Wassim Abou-JaoudéComputational Systems Biology Team, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS UMR8197, INSERM U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University Paris, France.
Pauline TraynardComputational Systems Biology Team, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS UMR8197, INSERM U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University Paris, France.
Pedro T MonteiroINESC-ID/Instituto Superior Técnico, University of LisbonLisbon, Portugal; Instituto Gulbenkian de CiênciaOeiras, Portugal.
Julio Saez-RodriguezFaculty of Medicine, Joint Research Centre for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Germany.
Tomáš HelikarDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE, USA.
Denis ThieffryComputational Systems Biology Team, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS UMR8197, INSERM U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University Paris, France.
Claudine ChaouiyaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência Oeiras, Portugal.
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PTÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure · FRRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The logical (or logic) formalism is increasingly used to model regulatory and signaling networks. Complementing these applications, several groups contributed various methods and tools to support the definition and analysis of logical models. After an introduction to the logical modeling framework and to several of its variants, we review here a number of recent methodological advances to ease the analysis of large and intricate networks. In particular, we survey approaches to determine model attractors and their reachability properties, to assess the dynamical impact of variations of external signals, and to consistently reduce large models. To illustrate these developments, we further consider several published logical models for two important biological processes, namely the differentiation of T helper cells and the control of mammalian cell cycle.

Indexed as

attractorscell cycle controldiscrete dynamicslogical modelingreachability analysisregulatory and signaling networkssimulationT cells activation and differentiation

Identifiers

PMID27303434
PMCPMC4885885
OpenAlexW2436013910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.