Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303423›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Biofortification of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) with Iodine and Selenium in a Field Experiment.

Sylwester Smoleń, Łukasz Skoczylas, Iwona Ledwożyw-Smoleń, Roksana Rakoczy, Aneta Kopeć, Ewa Piątkowska, Renata Bieżanowska-Kopeć, Aneta Koronowicz, Joanna Kapusta-Duch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Selenium biofortification improves bioactive composition and antioxidant status in Plantago ovata Forsk., a medicinal plant.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylwester SmoleńUnit of Plant Nutrition, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Łukasz SkoczylasDepartment of Fruit, Vegetable and Mushroom Processing, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Iwona Ledwożyw-SmoleńUnit of Biochemistry, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Roksana RakoczyUnit of Plant Nutrition, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Aneta KopećDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Ewa PiątkowskaDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Renata Bieżanowska-KopećDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Aneta KoronowiczDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.
Joanna Kapusta-DuchDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The low content of iodine (I) and selenium (Se) forms available to plants in soil is one of the main causes of their insufficient transfer in the soil-plant-consumer system. Their deficiency occurs in food in the majority of human and farm animal populations around the world. Both elements are classified as beneficial elements. However, plant response to simultaneous fertilization with I and Se has not been investigated in depth. The study (conducted in 2012-2014) included soil fertilization of carrot cv. "Kazan F1" in the following combinations: (1) Control; (2) KI; (3) KIO3; (4) Na2SeO4; (5) Na2SeO3; (6) KI+Na2SeO4; (7) KIO3+Na2SeO4; (8) KI+Na2SeO3; (9) KIO3+Na2SeO3. I and Se were applied twice: before sowing and as top-dressing in a total dose of 5 kg I⋅ha(-1) and 1 kg Se⋅ha(-1). No negative effects of I and Se fertilization were noted with respect to carrot yield. Higher accumulation and the uptake by leaves and storage roots of I and Se were obtained after the application of KI than KIO3, as well as of Na2SeO4 than Na2SeO3, respectively. Transfer factor values for leaves and roots were about a dozen times higher for Se than for I. Selenomethionine content in carrot was higher after fertilization with Na2SeO4 than with Na2SeO3. However, it was the application of Na2SeO3, KI+Na2SeO3 and KIO3+Na2SeO3 that resulted in greater evenness within the years and a higher share of Se from selenomethionine in total Se in carrot plants. Consumption of 100 g f.w. of carrots fertilized with KI+Na2SeO3 and KIO3+Na2SeO3 can supply approximately or slightly exceed 100% of the Recommended Daily Allowance for I and Se. Moreover, the molar ratio of I and Se content in carrot fertilized with KI+Na2SeO3 and KIO3+Na2SeO3 was the best among the research plots.

Indexed as

beneficial elementbiofortification targetenrichment of plantsmineral nutritionselenomethioninetransfer factor

Identifiers

PMID27303423
PMCPMC4882318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.