Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303417›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

RNA-Seq Analysis of Differential Gene Expression Responding to Different Rhizobium Strains in Soybean (Glycine max) Roots.

Songli Yuan, Rong Li, Shuilian Chen, Haifeng Chen, Chanjuan Zhang, Limiao Chen, Qingnan Hao, Zhihui Shan, Zhonglu Yang, Dezhen Qiu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nodule-specificaBIOTECH · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identifying the Soybean microRNAs Related toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phosphate-SolubilizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Songli YuanKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Rong LiKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Shuilian ChenKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Haifeng ChenKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Chanjuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Limiao ChenKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Qingnan HaoKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Zhihui ShanKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Zhonglu YangKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Dezhen QiuKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Xiaojuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Xinan ZhouKey Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of AgricultureWuhan, China; Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agriculture SciencesWuhan, China.
Oil Crops Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root nodule symbiosis (RNS) between legume plants and rhizobia is the most efficient and productive source of nitrogen fixation, and has critical importance in agriculture and mesology. Soybean (Glycine max), one of the most important legume crops in the world, establishes a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with different types of rhizobia, and the efficiency of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soybean greatly depends on the symbiotic host-specificity. Although, it has been reported that rhizobia use surface polysaccharides, secretion proteins of the type-three secretion systems and nod factors to modulate host range, the host control of nodulation specificity remains poorly understood. In this report, the soybean roots of two symbiotic systems (Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain 113-2-soybean and Sinorhizobium fredii USDA205-soybean)with notable different nodulation phenotypes and the control were studied at five different post-inoculation time points (0.5, 7-24 h, 5, 16, and 21 day) by RNA-seq (Quantification). The results of qPCR analysis of 11 randomly-selected genes agreed with transcriptional profile data for 136 out of 165 (82.42%) data points and quality assessment showed that the sequencing library is of quality and reliable. Three comparisons (control vs. 113-2, control vs. USDA205 and USDA205 vs. 113-2) were made and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between them were analyzed. The number of DEGs at 16 days post-inoculation (dpi) was the highest in the three comparisons, and most of the DEGs in USDA205 vs. 113-2 were found at 16 dpi and 21 dpi. 44 go function terms in USDA205 vs. 113-2 were analyzed to evaluate the potential functions of the DEGs, and 10 important KEGG pathway enrichment terms were analyzed in the three comparisons. Some important genes induced in response to different strains (113-2 and USDA205) were identified and analyzed, and these genes primarily encoded soybean resistance proteins, NF-related proteins, nodulins and immunity defense proteins, as well as proteins involving flavonoids/flavone/flavonol biosynthesis and plant-pathogen interaction. Besides, 189 candidate genes are largely expressed in roots and\or nodules. The DEGs uncovered in this study provides molecular candidates for better understanding the mechanisms of symbiotic host-specificity and explaining the different symbiotic effects between soybean roots inoculated with different strains (113-2 and USDA205).

Indexed as

differential gene expression respondingdifferent nodulation phenotypesRNA-seqSoybeansymbiotic specificity

Identifiers

PMID27303417
PMCPMC4885319
OpenAlexW2412037045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.