Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303415›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Cell Wall Composition and Biomass Recalcitrance Differences Within a Genotypically Diverse Set of Brachypodium distachyon Inbred Lines.

Cynthia L Cass, Anastasiya A Lavell, Nicholas Santoro, Cliff E Foster, Steven D Karlen, Rebecca A Smith, John Ralph, David F Garvin, John C Sedbrook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia L CassSchool of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, NormalIL, USA; U.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, USA.
Anastasiya A LavellDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. PaulMN, USA; Plant Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, St. PaulMN, USA.
Nicholas SantoroU.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, USA.
Cliff E FosterU.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, USA.
Steven D KarlenU.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI, USA.
Rebecca A SmithU.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI, USA.
John RalphU.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, USA; Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, USA.
David F GarvinDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. PaulMN, USA; Plant Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, St. PaulMN, USA.
John C SedbrookSchool of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, NormalIL, USA; U.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, USA.
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center · USMichigan State University · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brachypodium distachyon (Brachypodium) has emerged as a useful model system for studying traits unique to graminaceous species including bioenergy crop grasses owing to its amenability to laboratory experimentation and the availability of extensive genetic and germplasm resources. Considerable natural variation has been uncovered for a variety of traits including flowering time, vernalization responsiveness, and above-ground growth characteristics. However, cell wall composition differences remain underexplored. Therefore, we assessed cell wall-related traits relevant to biomass conversion to biofuels in seven Brachypodium inbred lines that were chosen based on their high level of genotypic diversity as well as available genome sequences and recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations. Senesced stems plus leaf sheaths from these lines exhibited significant differences in acetyl bromide soluble lignin (ABSL), cell wall polysaccharide-derived sugars, hydroxycinnamates content, and syringyl:guaiacyl:p-hydroxyphenyl (S:G:H) lignin ratios. Free glucose, sucrose, and starch content also differed significantly in senesced stems, as did the amounts of sugars released from cell wall polysaccharides (digestibility) upon exposure to a panel of thermochemical pretreatments followed by hydrolytic enzymatic digestion. Correlations were identified between inbred line lignin compositions and plant growth characteristics such as biomass accumulation and heading date (HD), and between amounts of cell wall polysaccharides and biomass digestibility. Finally, stem cell wall p-coumarate and ferulate contents and free-sugars content changed significantly with increased duration of vernalization for some inbred lines. Taken together, these results show that Brachypodium displays substantial phenotypic variation with respect to cell wall composition and biomass digestibility, with some compositional differences correlating with growth characteristics. Moreover, besides influencing HD and biomass accumulation, vernalization was found to affect cell wall composition and free sugars accumulation in some Brachypodium inbred lines, suggesting genetic differences in how vernalization affects carbon flux to polysaccharides. The availability of related RIL populations will allow for the genetic and molecular dissection of this natural variation, the knowledge of which may inform ways to genetically improve bioenergy crop grasses.

Indexed as

bioenergydigestibilitygrasshemicelluloseligninpolysaccharidePooideaevernalization

Identifiers

PMID27303415
PMCPMC4880586
OpenAlexW2403855170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.