Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303383›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Replicates, Read Numbers, and Other Important Experimental Design Considerations for Microbial RNA-seq Identified Using Bacillus thuringiensis Datasets.

Punita Manga, Dawn M Klingeman, Tse-Yuan S Lu, Tonia L Mehlhorn, Dale A Pelletier, Loren J Hauser, Charlotte M Wilson, Steven D Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Punita MangaGraduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of TennesseeKnoxville, TN, USA; BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA.
Dawn M KlingemanBioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA.
Tse-Yuan S LuBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Tonia L MehlhornEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Dale A PelletierGraduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of TennesseeKnoxville, TN, USA; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA.
Loren J HauserGraduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of TennesseeKnoxville, TN, USA; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA.
Charlotte M WilsonBioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA.
Steven D BrownGraduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of TennesseeKnoxville, TN, USA; BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-seq is being used increasingly for gene expression studies and it is revolutionizing the fields of genomics and transcriptomics. However, the field of RNA-seq analysis is still evolving. Therefore, we specifically designed this study to contain large numbers of reads and four biological replicates per condition so we could alter these parameters and assess their impact on differential expression results. Bacillus thuringiensis strains ATCC10792 and CT43 were grown in two Luria broth medium lots on four dates and transcriptomics data were generated using one lane of sequence output from an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument for each of the 32 samples, which were then analyzed using DESeq2. Genome coverages across samples ranged from 87 to 465X with medium lots and culture dates identified as major variation sources. Significantly differentially expressed genes (5% FDR, two-fold change) were detected for cultures grown using different medium lots and between different dates. The highly differentially expressed iron acquisition and metabolism genes, were a likely consequence of differing amounts of iron in the two media lots. Indeed, in this study RNA-seq was a tool for predictive biology since we hypothesized and confirmed the two LB medium lots had different iron contents (~two-fold difference). This study shows that the noise in data can be controlled and minimized with appropriate experimental design and by having the appropriate number of replicates and reads for the system being studied. We outline parameters for an efficient and cost effective microbial transcriptomics study.

Indexed as

coverageDESeq2Illuminanegative binomialnormalizationreplicates

Identifiers

PMID27303383
PMCPMC4886094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.