ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016
Myxobacteria: Moving, Killing, Feeding, and Surviving Together.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
195 citing papers in PubMed, 425 citations in OpenAlex.
- Divergent contributions of multiple PPIases to cell survival, sociality, and stress tolerance inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Predatory Mechanisms of Myxobacteria and Their Potential in the Development of Biocontrol Agents.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Enhanced Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt Through Optimized Solid-State Fermentation ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Ancestral neuronal receptors are bacterial accessory toxins.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Predator avoidance promotes inter-bacterial symbiosis with myxobacteria in polymicrobial communities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Biosensor Technologies for Avian Influenza Detection: A New Frontier in Rapid Diagnostics for HPAI.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Optimized fermentation of Myxococcus fulvus WCH05 enhances biocontrol of pear fire blight in the field.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Predator avoidance promotes interbacterial symbiosis with myxobacteria in polymicrobial communities.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Article
- PredatoryFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bottleneck size drives the evolution of cooperative traits in an aggregative multicellular myxobacterium.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Laboratory screening and field validation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Biocontrol of watermelon Fusarium wilt caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- From predation to function: how myxobacteria drive soil microbial community dynamics and ecological functions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Myxobacteria isolated from recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS): ecology and significance as off-flavor producers.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Cell differentiation, aging, and death in spatially organized yeast communities: mechanisms and consequences.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Review
- South African Myxococcota: an untapped resource for microbial ecolo gy and biotechnology.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Genetic and environmental determinants of streaming and aggregation in Myxococcus xanthus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Capillary interactions drive the self-organization of bacterial colonies.Nature physics · 2025Article
135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myxococcus xanthus, like other myxobacteria, is a social bacterium that moves and feeds cooperatively in predatory groups. On surfaces, rod-shaped vegetative cells move in search of the prey in a coordinated manner, forming dynamic multicellular groups referred to as swarms. Within the swarms, cells interact with one another and use two separate locomotion systems. Adventurous motility, which drives the movement of individual cells, is associated with the secretion of slime that forms trails at the leading edge of the swarms. It has been proposed that cellular traffic along these trails contributes to M. xanthus social behavior via stigmergic regulation. However, most of the cells travel in groups by using social motility, which is cell contact-dependent and requires a large number of individuals. Exopolysaccharides and the retraction of type IV pili at alternate poles of the cells are the engines associated with social motility. When the swarms encounter prey, the population of M. xanthus lyses and takes up nutrients from nearby cells. This cooperative and highly density-dependent feeding behavior has the advantage that the pool of hydrolytic enzymes and other secondary metabolites secreted by the entire group is shared by the community to optimize the use of the degradation products. This multicellular behavior is especially observed in the absence of nutrients. In this condition, M. xanthus swarms have the ability to organize the gliding movements of 1000s of rods, synchronizing rippling waves of oscillating cells, to form macroscopic fruiting bodies, with three subpopulations of cells showing division of labor. A small fraction of cells either develop into resistant myxospores or remain as peripheral rods, while the majority of cells die, probably to provide nutrients to allow aggregation and spore differentiation. Sporulation within multicellular fruiting bodies has the benefit of enabling survival in hostile environments, and increases germination and growth rates when cells encounter favorable conditions. Herein, we review how these social bacteria cooperate and review the main cell-cell signaling systems used for communication to maintain multicellularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.