Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303369›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

The Ecology of Acidobacteria: Moving beyond Genes and Genomes.

Anna M Kielak, Cristine C Barreto, George A Kowalchuk, Johannes A van Veen, Eiko E Kuramae

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 364 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
364citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
66.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

364 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,081 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Global climate gradients structure soilbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

304 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna M KielakDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology - Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Wageningen, Netherlands.
Cristine C BarretoGraduate Program in Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology, Universidade Católica de Brasília Brasília, Brazil.
George A KowalchukEcology and Biodiversity Group, University of Utrecht Utrecht, Netherlands.
Johannes A van VeenDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology - Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Wageningen, Netherlands.
Eiko E KuramaeDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology - Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Wageningen, Netherlands.
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLNetherlands Institute of Ecology · NLUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BRUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylum Acidobacteria is one of the most widespread and abundant on the planet, yet remarkably our knowledge of the role of these diverse organisms in the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems remains surprisingly rudimentary. This blatant knowledge gap stems to a large degree from the difficulties associated with the cultivation of these bacteria by classical means. Given the phylogenetic breadth of the Acidobacteria, which is similar to the metabolically diverse Proteobacteria, it is clear that detailed and functional descriptions of acidobacterial assemblages are necessary. Fortunately, recent advances are providing a glimpse into the ecology of members of the phylum Acidobacteria. These include novel cultivation and enrichment strategies, genomic characterization and analyses of metagenomic DNA from environmental samples. Here, we couple the data from these complementary approaches for a better understanding of their role in the environment, thereby providing some initial insights into the ecology of this important phylum. All cultured acidobacterial type species are heterotrophic, and members of subdivisions 1, 3, and 4 appear to be more versatile in carbohydrate utilization. Genomic and metagenomic data predict a number of ecologically relevant capabilities for some acidobacteria, including the ability to: use of nitrite as N source, respond to soil macro-, micro nutrients and soil acidity, express multiple active transporters, degrade gellan gum and produce exopolysaccharide (EPS). Although these predicted properties allude to a competitive life style in soil, only very few of these prediction shave been confirmed via physiological studies. The increased availability of genomic and physiological information, coupled to distribution data in field surveys and experiments, should direct future progress in unraveling the ecology of this important but still enigmatic phylum.

Indexed as

Acidobacteriacarbohydrate metabolismEPSnitrogen metabolismsoil factorstransporters

Identifiers

PMID27303369
PMCPMC4885859
OpenAlexW2428898156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.