Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303366›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Recent Advances in Screening of Anti-Campylobacter Activity in Probiotics for Use in Poultry.

Manuel J Saint-Cyr, Muriel Guyard-Nicodème, Soumaya Messaoudi, Marianne Chemaly, Jean-Michel Cappelier, Xavier Dousset, Nabila Haddad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review on skeletal disorders caused byThe veterinary quarterly · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  10. The Detection of Potential Native ProbioticsAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Editorial:Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Overview of the Use of Probiotics in Poultry Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  20. Modulatory Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel J Saint-CyrSECALIM Unit UMR1014, Oniris, INRA, Université Bretagne Loire Nantes, France.
Muriel Guyard-NicodèmeHygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products Unit, Ploufragan/Plouzané Laboratory, ANSES, Université Bretagne Loire Ploufragan, France.
Soumaya MessaoudiSECALIM Unit UMR1014, Oniris, INRA, Université Bretagne Loire Nantes, France.
Marianne ChemalyHygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products Unit, Ploufragan/Plouzané Laboratory, ANSES, Université Bretagne Loire Ploufragan, France.
Jean-Michel CappelierSECALIM Unit UMR1014, Oniris, INRA, Université Bretagne Loire Nantes, France.
Xavier DoussetSECALIM Unit UMR1014, Oniris, INRA, Université Bretagne Loire Nantes, France.
Nabila HaddadSECALIM Unit UMR1014, Oniris, INRA, Université Bretagne Loire Nantes, France.
Mycologie et Sécurité des Aliments · FROniris · FRSécurité et Qualité des Produits d'Origine Végétale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacteriosis is the most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide. Campylobacter species involved in this infection usually include the thermotolerant species Campylobacter jejuni. The major reservoir for C. jejuni leading to human infections is commercial broiler chickens. Poultry flocks are frequently colonized by C. jejuni without any apparent symptoms. Risk assessment analyses have identified the handling and consumption of poultry meat as one of the most important sources of human campylobacteriosis, so elimination of Campylobacter in the poultry reservoir is a crucial step in the control of this foodborne infection. To date, the use of probiotics has demonstrated promising results to reduce Campylobacter colonization. This review provides recent insights into methods used for probiotic screening to reduce the prevalence and colonization of Campylobacter at the farm level. Different eukaryotic epithelial cell lines are employed to screen probiotics with an anti-Campylobacter activity and yield useful information about the inhibition mechanism involved. These in vitro virulence models involve only human intestinal or cervical cell lines whereas the use of avian cell lines could be a preliminary step to investigate mechanisms of C. jejuni colonization in poultry in the presence of probiotics. In addition, in vivo trials to evaluate the effect of probiotics on Campylobacter colonization are conducted, taking into account the complexity introduced by the host, the feed, and the microbiota. However, the heterogeneity of the protocols used and the short time duration of the experiments lead to results that are difficult to compare and draw conclusions at the slaughter-age of broilers. Nevertheless, the combined approach using complementary in vitro and in vivo tools (cell cultures and animal experiments) leads to a better characterization of probiotic strains and could be employed to assess reduced Campylobacter spp. colonization in chickens if some parameters are optimized.

Indexed as

Campylobacterin vitro virulencein vivo colonizationpoultryprobioticsscreening

Identifiers

PMID27303366
PMCPMC4885830
OpenAlexW2416510841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.