ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016
Recent Advances in Screening of Anti-Campylobacter Activity in Probiotics for Use in Poultry.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of oral and cloacal administration of Lactobacillus probiotics and postbiotics against Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broiler chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Interventions and Control Measures in the Reduction ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Major Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry: Implications for Human Health and the Poultry Industry and Probiotic Mitigation Strategies.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- The Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Dairy By-Products in ControllingMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Drug Resistance in Poultry Production: Current Status and Innovative Strategies for Bacterial Control.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Intervention Strategies to ControlMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Review on skeletal disorders caused byThe veterinary quarterly · 2022Review
- Chicken embryos are a valuable model for the selection of Bacillus subtilis for probiotic purposes.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Review
- The Detection of Potential Native ProbioticsAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Alternatives to antibiotics for organic poultry production: types, modes of action and impacts on bird's health and production.Poultry science · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Intermittent fasting positively modulates human gut microbial diversity and ameliorates blood lipid profile.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Editorial:Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Can good broiler flock welfare prevent colonization by Campylobacter?Poultry science · 2021Article
- Impact of the gut microecology on Campylobacter presence revealed by comparisons of the gut microbiota from chickens raised on litter or in individual cages.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Overview of the Use of Probiotics in Poultry Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Modulatory Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Campylobacteriosis is the most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide. Campylobacter species involved in this infection usually include the thermotolerant species Campylobacter jejuni. The major reservoir for C. jejuni leading to human infections is commercial broiler chickens. Poultry flocks are frequently colonized by C. jejuni without any apparent symptoms. Risk assessment analyses have identified the handling and consumption of poultry meat as one of the most important sources of human campylobacteriosis, so elimination of Campylobacter in the poultry reservoir is a crucial step in the control of this foodborne infection. To date, the use of probiotics has demonstrated promising results to reduce Campylobacter colonization. This review provides recent insights into methods used for probiotic screening to reduce the prevalence and colonization of Campylobacter at the farm level. Different eukaryotic epithelial cell lines are employed to screen probiotics with an anti-Campylobacter activity and yield useful information about the inhibition mechanism involved. These in vitro virulence models involve only human intestinal or cervical cell lines whereas the use of avian cell lines could be a preliminary step to investigate mechanisms of C. jejuni colonization in poultry in the presence of probiotics. In addition, in vivo trials to evaluate the effect of probiotics on Campylobacter colonization are conducted, taking into account the complexity introduced by the host, the feed, and the microbiota. However, the heterogeneity of the protocols used and the short time duration of the experiments lead to results that are difficult to compare and draw conclusions at the slaughter-age of broilers. Nevertheless, the combined approach using complementary in vitro and in vivo tools (cell cultures and animal experiments) leads to a better characterization of probiotic strains and could be employed to assess reduced Campylobacter spp. colonization in chickens if some parameters are optimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.