ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2016
Transcranial Electrical Neuromodulation Based on the Reciprocity Principle.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03062553 (Enhancement of Treatment of Delusions in Schizophrenia Through Neuromodulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancement of Treatment of Delusions in Schizophrenia Through Neuromodulation
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel technique for accurate electrode placement over cortical targets for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) clinical trials.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Trial
- Safety of slow-pulsed transcranial electrical stimulation in acute spike suppression.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019Trial
- Perspectives on Optimized Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Based on Spatial Electric Field Modeling in Humans.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Towards causal mechanisms of consciousness through focused transcranial brain stimulation.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023Review
- Personalized tDCS for Focal Epilepsy-A Narrative Review: A Data-Driven Workflow Based on Imaging and EEG Data.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Modulating Inhibitory Control Processes Using Individualized High Definition Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HD θ-tACS) of the Anterior Cingulate and Medial Prefrontal Cortex.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Increasing the amplitude of intrinsic theta in the human brain.AIMS neuroscience · 2020Article
- Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS.NeuroImage · 2019Article
- Optimal use of EEG recordings to target active brain areas with transcranial electrical stimulation.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Transcranial Electrical Neuromodulation Based on the Reciprocity Principle.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2016Article
- Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Designing Interventions Informed by Scientific Knowledge About Effects of Early Adversity: A Translational Neuroscience Agenda for Next Generation Addictions Research.Current addiction reports · 2015Article
- Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop.Brain stimulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key challenge in multi-electrode transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is to find a current injection pattern that delivers the necessary current density at a target and minimizes it in the rest of the head, which is mathematically modeled as an optimization problem. Such an optimization with the Least Squares (LS) or Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV) algorithms is generally computationally expensive and requires multiple independent current sources. Based on the reciprocity principle in electroencephalography (EEG) and TES, it could be possible to find the optimal TES patterns quickly whenever the solution of the forward EEG problem is available for a brain region of interest. Here, we investigate the reciprocity principle as a guideline for finding optimal current injection patterns in TES that comply with safety constraints. We define four different trial cortical targets in a detailed seven-tissue finite element head model, and analyze the performance of the reciprocity family of TES methods in terms of electrode density, targeting error, focality, intensity, and directionality using the LS and LCMV solutions as the reference standards. It is found that the reciprocity algorithms show good performance comparable to the LCMV and LS solutions. Comparing the 128 and 256 electrode cases, we found that use of greater electrode density improves focality, directionality, and intensity parameters. The results show that reciprocity principle can be used to quickly determine optimal current injection patterns in TES and help to simplify TES protocols that are consistent with hardware and software availability and with safety constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.