Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303311›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2016

Transcranial Electrical Neuromodulation Based on the Reciprocity Principle.

Mariano Fernández-Corazza, Sergei Turovets, Phan Luu, Erik Anderson, Don Tucker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03062553 (Enhancement of Treatment of Delusions in Schizophrenia Through Neuromodulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03062553 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Enhancement of Treatment of Delusions in Schizophrenia Through Neuromodulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsSchizophrenia, Psychosis, DelusionsArmsMetacognitive Training (MCT), Sham/MCT, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariano Fernández-CorazzaNeuroInformatics Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; LEICI Instituto de Investigaciones en Electrónica, Control y Procesamiento de Señales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), CONICET, La Plata, Argentina.
Sergei TurovetsNeuroInformatics Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; Electrical Geodesics Inc., Eugene, OR, USA.
Phan LuuNeuroInformatics Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; Electrical Geodesics Inc., Eugene, OR, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Erik AndersonElectrical Geodesics Inc. , Eugene, OR , USA.
Don TuckerNeuroInformatics Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; Electrical Geodesics Inc., Eugene, OR, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Funding

Pediatric Head Models for Improved Imaging of Neurological DevelopmentR44MH106421 · NIMH · ELECTRICAL GEODESICS, INC. · PI TUROVETS, SERGEI · 2014 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH106421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in multi-electrode transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is to find a current injection pattern that delivers the necessary current density at a target and minimizes it in the rest of the head, which is mathematically modeled as an optimization problem. Such an optimization with the Least Squares (LS) or Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV) algorithms is generally computationally expensive and requires multiple independent current sources. Based on the reciprocity principle in electroencephalography (EEG) and TES, it could be possible to find the optimal TES patterns quickly whenever the solution of the forward EEG problem is available for a brain region of interest. Here, we investigate the reciprocity principle as a guideline for finding optimal current injection patterns in TES that comply with safety constraints. We define four different trial cortical targets in a detailed seven-tissue finite element head model, and analyze the performance of the reciprocity family of TES methods in terms of electrode density, targeting error, focality, intensity, and directionality using the LS and LCMV solutions as the reference standards. It is found that the reciprocity algorithms show good performance comparable to the LCMV and LS solutions. Comparing the 128 and 256 electrode cases, we found that use of greater electrode density improves focality, directionality, and intensity parameters. The results show that reciprocity principle can be used to quickly determine optimal current injection patterns in TES and help to simplify TES protocols that are consistent with hardware and software availability and with safety constraints.

Indexed as

high-density electrode arraysnon-invasive neuromodulationreciprocity principletranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27303311
PMCPMC4882341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.