Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27303298›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2016

Microneedles As a Delivery System for Gene Therapy.

Wei Chen, Hui Li, De Shi, Zhenguo Liu, Weien Yuan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Smart micro/nanoneedles for gene delivery.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Delivery Strategies of siRNA Therapeutics for Hair Loss Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Transdermal delivery for gene therapy.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Microneedle systems for delivering nucleic acid drugs.Journal of pharmaceutical investigation · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei ChenDepartment of Neurology, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to the Medical School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China.
Hui LiSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China.
De ShiDepartment of Neurology, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to the Medical School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China.
Zhenguo LiuDepartment of Neurology, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to the Medical School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China.
Weien YuanSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene delivery systems can be divided to two major types: vector-based (either viral vector or non-viral vector) and physical delivery technologies. Many physical carriers, such as electroporation, gene gun, ultrasound start to be proved to have the potential to enable gene therapy. A relatively new physical delivery technology for gene delivery consists of microneedles (MNs), which has been studied in many fields and for many molecule types and indications. Microneedles can penetrate the stratum corneum, which is the main barrier for drug delivery through the skin with ease of administration and without significant pain. Many different kinds of MNs, such as metal MNs, coated MNs, dissolving MNs have turned out to be promising in gene delivery. In this review, we discussed the potential as well as the challenges of utilizing MNs to deliver nucleic acids for gene therapy. We also proposed that a combination of MNs and other gene delivery approaches may lead to a better delivery system for gene therapy.

Indexed as

approachesdeliverygenemicronnedlestherapy

Identifiers

PMID27303298
PMCPMC4880556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.