ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2016
Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical outcomes of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for acute and chronic coronary artery syndromes: based on Sulaimani cardiac registry.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Early Saphenous Vein Graft Aneurysm Rupture: A Not So-Late Complication. Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Outcomes of Emergent Isolated Coronary Bypass Grafting in Heart Failure Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Surgical coronary revascularization in patients with COVID-19; complications and outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Predictive value of ACEF II score in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing one-stop hybrid coronary revascularization.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Preoperative, Multidisciplinary Clinical Optimization of Patients with Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Who Are Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Cardiology and therapy · 2021Review
- Impact of Pre-, Intra-and Post-Operative Parameters on In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Scarce Single-Center Experience in Resource-Scare Setting.Vascular health and risk management · 2021Article
- Early and late outcomes of single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization for patients in critical condition.PloS one · 2021Article
- Early respiratory outcomes following cardiac surgery in patients with COVID-19.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2020Article
- Is there really a benefit of using minimized cardiopulmonary bypass in CABG? A retrospective propensity score-matched study with 5000 cases.Heart and vessels · 2020Article
- Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2016Article
- [Analysis of cardiac surgeries and operative mortality at the National Cardiovascular Institute during 2022].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with increased in-hospital mortality rates and adverse events. This study retrospectively evaluated indications and outcomes in patients who underwent emergency CABG. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database for a single center (Jewish Hospital) was queried to identify patients undergoing isolated CABG. Univariate analysis was performed. From January 2003 through December 2013, 5,940 patients underwent CABG; 212 presented with emergency status. A high proportion of female patients (28.2%) underwent emergency surgery. Emergency CABG patients experienced high rates of intra-aortic balloon pump support, bleeding, dialysis, in-hospital death, and prolonged length of stay. The proportion of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting declined during years 2008-2013 compared with 2003-2007 (2.2% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001), but the incidence of angiographic accident (5.3% vs. 29.2%) increased as an indication. Ongoing ischemia remains the most frequent indication for emergency CABG, yet the incidence of angiographic accident has greatly increased. In-hospital mortality rates and adverse events remain high. If we look specifically at emergency CABG cases arising from angiographic accident, we find that 14 (15%) of all 93 emergency CABG deaths occurred in that subset of patients. Efforts to improve outcomes should therefore be focused on this high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.