ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2016
CONSTANd : A Normalization Method for Isobaric Labeled Spectra by Constrained Optimization.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Synthetic plasma pool cohort correction for affinity-based proteomics datasets allows multiple study comparison.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Yolk-deprivedLife science alliance · 2023Article
- Loss of NDR1/2 kinases impairs endomembrane trafficking and autophagy leading to neurodegeneration.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- FMO3 deficiency of duck leads to decreased lipid deposition and increased antibacterial activity.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Quantitative single-cell proteomics as a tool to characterize cellular hierarchies.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Quantitative phosphoproteomics uncovers dysregulated kinase networks in Alzheimer's disease.Nature aging · 2021Article
- Towards Building a Quantitative Proteomics Toolbox in Precision Medicine: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- A Primer and Guidelines for Shotgun Proteomic Analysis in Non-model Organisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Phosphoproteomics identifies microglial Siglec-F inflammatory response during neurodegeneration.Molecular systems biology · 2020Article
- Isobaric Matching between Runs and Novel PSM-Level Normalization in MaxQuant Strongly Improve Reporter Ion-Based Quantification.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- MSstatsTMT: Statistical Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins in Experiments with Isobaric Labeling and Multiple Mixtures.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Article
- Multibatch TMT Reveals False Positives, Batch Effects and Missing Values.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Proteomic changes in oocytes after in vitro maturation in lipotoxic conditions are different from those in cumulus cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Proteomic Analysis of the Cell Cycle of Procylic FormMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In quantitative proteomics applications, the use of isobaric labels is a very popular concept as they allow for multiplexing, such that peptides from multiple biological samples are quantified simultaneously in one mass spectrometry experiment. Although this multiplexing allows that peptide intensities are affected by the same amount of instrument variability, systematic effects during sample preparation can also introduce a bias in the quantitation measurements. Therefore, normalization methods are required to remove this systematic error. At present, a few dedicated normalization methods for isobaric labeled data are at hand. Most of these normalization methods include a framework for statistical data analysis and rely on ANOVA or linear mixed models. However, for swift quality control of the samples or data visualization a simple normalization technique is sufficient. To this aim, we present a new and easy-to-use data-driven normalization method, named CONSTANd. The CONSTANd method employs constrained optimization and prior information about the labeling strategy to normalize the peptide intensities. Further, it allows maintaining the connection to any biological effect while reducing the systematic and technical errors. As a result, peptides can not only be compared directly within a multiplexed experiment, but are also comparable between other isobaric labeled datasets from multiple experimental designs that are normalized by the CONSTANd method, without the need to include a reference sample in every experimental setup. The latter property is especially useful when more than six, eight or ten (TMT/iTRAQ) biological samples are required to detect differential peptides with sufficient statistical power and to optimally make use of the multiplexing capacity of isobaric labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.