Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27302844›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Prenatal testing in Huntington disease: after the test, choices recommence.

Hanane Bouchghoul, Stéphane-Françoise Clément, Danièle Vauthier, Cécile Cazeneuve, Sandrine Noel, Marc Dommergues, Delphine Héron, Jacky Nizard, Marcela Gargiulo, Alexandra Durr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hanane BouchghoulAPHP, Department of Gynaecology-Obstetrics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France.
Stéphane-Françoise ClémentDepartment of Research in Ethics, EA1610, University Paris Sud, Orsay, France.
Danièle VauthierAPHP, Department of Gynaecology-Obstetrics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France.
Cécile CazeneuveAPHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Sandrine NoelAPHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Marc DommerguesAPHP, Department of Gynaecology-Obstetrics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France.
Delphine HéronAPHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Jacky NizardAPHP, Department of Gynaecology-Obstetrics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France.
Marcela GargiuloAPHP, Department of Genetics, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Alexandra DurrICM (Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière), INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Sorbonne Universities - UPMC University Paris VI UMR_S1127, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was (1) to determine the impact of prenatal diagnosis (PND) for Huntington disease (HD) on subsequent reproductive choices and family structure; and (2) to assess whether children born after PND were informed of their genetic status. Out of 354 presymptomatic carriers of HD gene mutation, aged 18-45 years, 61 couples requested 101 PNDs. Fifty-four women, 29 female carriers and 25 spouses of male carriers, accepted to be interviewed (0.6-16.3 years after the last PND, median 6.5 years) on their obstetrical history and information given to children born after PND. Women were willing to undergo two or more PNDs with a final success rate of 75%. Reproductive decisions differed depending on the outcome of the first PND. If favourable, 62% couples decided against another pregnancy and 10% chose to have an untested child. If unfavourable, 83% decided for another pregnancy (P<0.01), and the majority (87%) re-entered the PND procedure. In contrast, after a second PND, only 37% asked for a PND and 30% chose to have an untested child. Thirty-three percent had both, tested and untested children. Among children born after PND, 10 years and older, 75% were informed of their genetic status. The decision to prevent transmission of the HD mutation is made anew with each pregnancy. Couples may need more psychological support after PND and pre-counselling sessions should take into account the effect of the outcome of a first PND on subsequent reproductive choices.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeterozygoteHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleMutationPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisTruth Disclosure

Identifiers

PMID27302844
PMCPMC5110058
OpenAlexW2436741432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.