Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27302756›Full record

ArticlemBio2016

Differing Efficacies of Lead Group A Streptococcal Vaccine Candidates and Full-Length M Protein in Cutaneous and Invasive Disease Models.

Tania Rivera-Hernandez, Manisha Pandey, Anna Henningham, Jason Cole, Biswa Choudhury, Amanda J Cork, Christine M Gillen, Khairunnisa Abdul Ghaffar, Nicholas P West, Guido Silvestri and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The N-terminal ELRThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Vaccines · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tania Rivera-HernandezAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Manisha PandeyInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Anna HenninghamUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Jason ColeUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Biswa ChoudhuryUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Amanda J CorkAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Christine M GillenAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Khairunnisa Abdul GhaffarAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Nicholas P WestAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Guido SilvestriEmory Vaccine Center and Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael F GoodInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Peter M MoyleAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Istvan TothAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Victor NizetUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Michael R BatzloffInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Mark J WalkerAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia mark.walker@uq.edu.au.
University of Queensland · AUUniversity of California, San Diego · USGriffith University · AUEmory University · US

Funding

GAS Switch from Colonizing Bacterium to Invasive PathogenR01AI077780 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NIZET, VICTOR · 2008 to 2019
$3.8M
Mechanisms of the M protein in group A Streptococcus virulenceR01AI096837 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PARTHO, NIZET, VICTOR · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077780NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI096837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGroup A Streptococcus (GAS) is an important human pathogen responsible for both superficial infections and invasive diseases. Autoimmune sequelae may occur upon repeated infection. For this reason, development of a vaccine against GAS represents a major challenge, since certain GAS components may trigger autoimmunity. We formulated three combination vaccines containing the following: (i) streptolysin O (SLO), interleukin 8 (IL-8) protease (Streptococcus pyogenes cell envelope proteinase [SpyCEP]), group A streptococcal C5a peptidase (SCPA), arginine deiminase (ADI), and trigger factor (TF); (ii) the conserved M-protein-derived J8 peptide conjugated to ADI; and (iii) group A carbohydrate lacking the N-acetylglucosamine side chain conjugated to ADI. We compared these combination vaccines to a "gold standard" for immunogenicity, full-length M1 protein. Vaccines were adjuvanted with alum, and mice were immunized on days 0, 21, and 28. On day 42, mice were challenged via cutaneous or subcutaneous routes. High-titer antigen-specific antibody responses with bactericidal activity were detected in mouse serum samples for all vaccine candidates. In comparison with sham-immunized mice, all vaccines afforded protection against cutaneous challenge. However, only full-length M1 protein provided protection in the subcutaneous invasive disease model. IMPORTANCE: This set of experiments demonstrates the inherent variability of mouse models for the characterization of GAS vaccine candidate protective efficacy. Such variability poses an important challenge for GAS vaccine development, as advancement of candidates to human clinical trials requires strong evidence of efficacy. This study highlights the need for an open discussion within the field regarding standardization of animal models for GAS vaccine development.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAlum CompoundsAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacteremiaBlood Bactericidal ActivityDisease Models, AnimalMice, Inbred BALB CSkin Diseases, BacterialStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcal VaccinesStreptococcus pyogenesTreatment OutcomeVaccines, CombinedVaccines, ConjugateAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialStreptococcal VaccinesVaccines, CombinedVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID27302756
PMCPMC4916377
OpenAlexW2429451564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.