Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27302475›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

How does prescribing for antihypertensive products stack up against guideline recommendations? An Australian population-based study (2006-2014).

Andrea L Schaffer, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Nicholas A Buckley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Persistence and Adherence to Cardiovascular Medicines in Australia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among treated older adults.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea L SchafferCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. andrea.schaffer@student.unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3701-4997
Sallie-Anne PearsonCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Nicholas A BuckleyBlackburn Building (D06), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe describe choice of first-line antihypertensive drug therapy and uptake of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in Australia, and investigate the impact of initiation on FDCs and other non-recommended first-line therapies on treatment discontinuation.

methodThis was a population-based retrospective cohort study using a random 10% sample of persons dispensed an Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listed medicine from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2014. The primary outcomes were adherence to Australian recommendations at initiation of antihypertensive therapy, discontinuation of initial therapy and discontinuation of any therapy in the first year after initiation.

resultsIn our sample of 55 937 persons initiating therapy, 42.0% did so outside Australian recommendations, including not initiating on recommended monotherapy (26.3%) and not initiating on the lowest recommended dose (30.6%). Only 1.7% of individuals who were dispensed an FDC established therapy on the free combination regimen (as recommended) prior to switching. After adjusting for covariates, persons initiating on non-recommended monotherapy (OR = 2.64, 95% CI 2.47-2.83) or FDCs of two or more antihypertensives (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.55), were more likely to discontinue all antihypertensive drug treatment in the first year compared to persons initiating on recommended monotherapy.

conclusionMore than half of antihypertensive initiators conformed to Australian guidelines. Initiation on FDCs and other non-recommended treatments was associated with lower persistence on antihypertensive therapy in the first year. Long-term effectiveness and outcomes may be enhanced by initiating with low dose monotherapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsAustraliaDrug MonitoringDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntihypertensive AgentsAustraliafixed-dose combinationshypertensionpharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID27302475
PMCPMC5137838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.