Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27302396›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2016

Extracellular matrix motion and early morphogenesis.

Rajprasad Loganathan, Brenda J Rongish, Christopher M Smith, Michael B Filla, Andras Czirok, Bertrand Bénazéraf, Charles D Little

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Live Cell Imaging of Bone Cell and Organ Cultures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell Response in Free-Packed Granular Systems.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022
    Article
  16. Static and Dynamic Biomaterial Engineering for Cell Modulation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Modeling human neurodevelopmental diseases with brain organoids.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  18. The ECM: To Scaffold, or Not to Scaffold, That Is the Question.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rajprasad LoganathanDepartment of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Brenda J RongishDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Christopher M SmithDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC 20059, USA.
Michael B FillaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Andras CzirokDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA Department of Biological Physics, Eotvos University, Budapest 1117, Hungary.
Bertrand BénazérafInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), CNRS (UMR 7104), Inserm U964, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch Graffenstaden 67400, France.
Charles D LittleDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA clittle@kumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-0827

Funding

Morphogenetic Tissue Movements in Early EmbryosR01GM102801 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CZIROK, ANDRAS · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over a century, embryologists who studied cellular motion in early amniotes generally assumed that morphogenetic movement reflected migration relative to a static extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold. However, as we discuss in this Review, recent investigations reveal that the ECM is also moving during morphogenesis. Time-lapse studies show how convective tissue displacement patterns, as visualized by ECM markers, contribute to morphogenesis and organogenesis. Computational image analysis distinguishes between cell-autonomous (active) displacements and convection caused by large-scale (composite) tissue movements. Modern quantification of large-scale 'total' cellular motion and the accompanying ECM motion in the embryo demonstrates that a dynamic ECM is required for generation of the emergent motion patterns that drive amniote morphogenesis.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisMotionAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansInvertebratesOrganogenesisAmniote morphogenesisEmergent patternsExtracellular matrix dynamicsTissue-scale motion

Identifiers

PMID27302396
PMCPMC4920166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.