Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27301982›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2016

In Silico Testing of an Artificial-Intelligence-Based Artificial Pancreas Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting.

Leon DeJournett, Jeremy DeJournett

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05386849 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Demonstration of an Artificial Intelligence Based Closed Loop Glucose Control System as a Therapeutic Modality in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdeal Medical TechnologiesRan2022 to 2022Enrolled3ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsFUSION closed loop glucose control system
NCT05644730 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Demonstration of an Artificial Intelligence Based Closed Loop Glucose Control System as a Therapeutic Modality in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdeal Medical TechnologiesRan2022 to 2024Enrolled7ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsFusion closed loop glucose control system
NCT07646067 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Demonstration of an Expert Rule-Based Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System for People With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdeal Medical TechnologiesRan2026 to 2027Enrolled6ConditionsType 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, Stress Induced HyperglycemiaArmsFUSION closed loop glucose control system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Today, Tomorrow and User Requirements.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leon DeJournettIdeal Medical Technologies Inc, Asheville, NC, USA leondej@idealmedtech.com.
Jeremy DeJournettIdeal Medical Technologies Inc, Asheville, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective glucose control in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting has the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality rates which should in turn lead to decreased health care expenditures. Current ICU-based glucose controllers are mathematically derived, and tend to be based on proportional integral derivative (PID) or model predictive control (MPC). Artificial intelligence (AI)-based closed loop glucose controllers may have the ability to achieve control that improves on the results achieved by either PID or MPC controllers.

methodWe conducted an in silico analysis of an AI-based glucose controller designed for use in the ICU setting. This controller was tested using a mathematical model of the ICU patient's glucose-insulin system. A total of 126 000 unique 5-day simulations were carried out, resulting in 107 million glucose values for analysis.

resultsFor the 7 control ranges tested, with a sensor error of ±10%, the following average results were achieved: (1) time in control range, 94.2%, (2) time in range 70-140 mg/dl, 97.8%, (3) time in hyperglycemic range (>140 mg/dl), 2.1%, and (4) time in hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dl), 0.09%. In addition, the average coefficient of variation (CV) was 11.1%.

conclusionsThis in silico study of an AI-based closed loop glucose controller shows that it may be able to improve on the results achieved by currently existing ICU-based PID/MPC controllers. If these results are confirmed in clinical testing, this AI-based controller could be used to create an artificial pancreas system for use in the ICU setting.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceModels, TheoreticalPancreas, ArtificialBlood GlucoseComputer SimulationHumansIntensive Care UnitsBlood Glucoseartificial intelligenceclosed loop controlcost savingsglucoseintensive care unitknowledge-based system

Identifiers

PMID27301982
PMCPMC5094333
OpenAlexW2435970426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.