Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27301965›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).

Linsong Dong, Shijun Xiao, Qiurong Wang, Zhiyong Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Association Study SuggestsCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning for genomic selection of aquatic animals.Marine life science & technology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Genome-Wide Association Study of Body Weight Trait in Yaks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic Selection in Aquaculture Species.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linsong DongKey Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples' Republic of China.
Shijun XiaoKey Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples' Republic of China.
Qiurong WangKey Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples' Republic of China.
Zhiyong WangKey Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples' Republic of China. zywang@jmu.edu.cn.
Jimei University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advances of sequencing technology accelerate the development of theory of molecular quantitative genetics such as QTL mapping, genome-wide association study and genomic selection. This paper was designed to study genomic selection in large yellow croaker breeding. The aims of this study were: (i) to estimate heritability values of traits in large yellow croaker; (ii) to assess feasibility of genomic selection in the traits of growth rate and meat quality; (iii) to compare predictive accuracies affected by different algorithms and training sizes, and to find what training sizes could reach ideal accuracies; (iv) to compare results of GWAS with genomic prediction, and to assess feasibility of pre-selection of significant SNPs in genomic selection. 500 individuals were tested in the trait of body weight and body length, while 176 were tested in the percentage of n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids (n-3HUFA) in muscle. GBLUP and emBayesB were used to perform genomic prediction.

resultsGenotyping-By-Sequencing method was used to construct the libraries for the NGS sequencing and find ~30,000 SNPs. Heritability estimates were 0.604, 0.586 and 0.438 for trait of body weight, body length and n-3HUFA, respectively. The predictive abilities estimated by GBLUP showed higher than that by emBayesB in traits of body weight and body length. However, the result was just the opposite in n-3HUFA. According to fit the curve of predictive accuracy, we estimated that at least 1000 individuals in training set could reach an accuracy of 0.8 in body weight and body length. GBLUP, emBayesB and GWAS could not always find significant SNPs associated with phenotypes consistently. Significant SNPs were selected by emBayesB could obtain the largest proportions to explain total additive genetic variances.

conclusionsThis research showed that genomic selection was feasible in large yellow croaker breeding. We suggest doing a test before deciding to use which algorithm in specific trait in genomic prediction. We estimated required training sizes to reach ideal predictive accuracies and assessed feasibility of pre-selection of SNPs successfully. Because of high mortality rate of fish and high cost in genomic sequencing, genomic selection may be more suitable for applying on some traits which cannot be measured on candidates directly.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsModels, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsFishesModels, StatisticalPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of ResultsGenome-wide association studyGenomic selectionGenotyping-by-sequencingLarge yellow croakerPredictive ability

Identifiers

PMID27301965
PMCPMC4907050
OpenAlexW2426470586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.