Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27301771›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Genomic analysis of the multi-host pathogen Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae reveals extensive recombination as well as the existence of three generalist clades with wide geographic distribution.

Taya Forde, Roman Biek, Ruth Zadoks, Matthew L Workentine, Jeroen De Buck, Susan Kutz, Tanja Opriessnig, Hannah Trewby, Frank van der Meer, Karin Orsel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  7. Microbiome resilience of three-toed box turtles (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of a Highly VirulentTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathological and Genomic Findings ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. First Report of Genetic Variability ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative genome analysis ofMicrobial genomics · 2020
    Article
  19. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  20. Genomic and Immunogenic Protein Diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taya FordeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Taya.Forde@glasgow.ac.uk.
Roman BiekCurrent address: Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Ruth ZadoksCurrent address: Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Matthew L WorkentineFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jeroen De BuckFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Susan KutzFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tanja OpriessnigThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.
Hannah TrewbyCurrent address: Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Frank van der MeerFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karin OrselFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge about how bacterial populations are structured is an important prerequisite for studying their ecology and evolutionary history and facilitates inquiry into host specificity, pathogenicity, geographic dispersal and molecular epidemiology. Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae is an opportunistic pathogen that is currently reemerging in both the swine and poultry industries globally. This bacterium sporadically causes mortalities in captive marine mammals, and has recently been implicated in large-scale wildlife die-offs. However, despite its economic relevance and broad geographic and host distribution, including zoonotic potential, the global diversity, recombination rates, and population structure of this bacterium remain poorly characterized. In this study, we conducted a broad-scale genomic comparison of E. rhusiopathiae based on a diverse collection of isolates in order to address these knowledge gaps.

resultsEighty-three E. rhusiopathiae isolates from a range of host species and geographic origins, isolated between 1958 and 2014, were sequenced and assembled using both reference-based mapping and de novo assembly. We found that a high proportion of the core genome (58 %) had undergone recombination. Therefore, we used three independent methods robust to the presence of recombination to define the population structure of this species: a phylogenetic tree based on a set of conserved protein sequences, in silico chromosome painting, and network analysis. All three methods were broadly concordant and supported the existence of three distinct clades within the species E. rhusiopathiae. Although we found some evidence of host and geographical clustering, each clade included isolates from diverse host species and from multiple continents.

conclusionsUsing whole genome sequence data, we confirm recent suggestions that E. rhusiopathiae is a weakly clonal species that has been shaped extensively by homologous recombination. Despite frequent recombination, we can reliably identify three distinct clades that do not clearly segregate by host species or geographic origin. Our results provide an essential baseline for future molecular epidemiological, ecological and evolutionary studies of E. rhusiopathiae and facilitate comparisons to other recombinogenic, multi-host bacteria.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsRecombination, GeneticAnimalsBacteriophagesCluster AnalysisErysipelothrixGenetics, PopulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Pathogen InteractionsPhylogenyPlasmidsSwineErysipelothrix rhusiopathiaeGenomicsGram positive bacteriaHomologous recombinationHost specificityMulti-host pathogenPopulation structureWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27301771
PMCPMC4906694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.