Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27301567›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings.

Christian Bottomley, Valerie Isham, Sarai Vivas-Martínez, Annette C Kuesel, Simon K Attah, Nicholas O Opoku, Sara Lustigman, Martin Walker, Maria-Gloria Basáñez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Loa loa Microfilariae in Skin Snips: Consequences for Onchocerciasis Monitoring and Evaluation in L. loa-Endemic Areas.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How Can Onchocerciasis Elimination in Africa Be Accelerated? Modeling the Impact of Increased Ivermectin Treatment Frequency and Complementary Vector Control.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Christian BottomleyMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. christian.bottomley@lshtm.ac.uk.
Valerie IshamDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Sarai Vivas-MartínezCátedra de Salud Pública. Facultad de Medicina (Escuela Luis Razetti), Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Annette C KueselUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simon K AttahDepartment of Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
Nicholas O OpokuUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences Research Centre (UHASRC) Hohoe, Volta Region, Ghana.
Sara LustigmanLaboratory of Molecular Parasitology, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, 310 E 67th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Martin WalkerLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine (St Mary's campus), Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Maria-Gloria BasáñezLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine (St Mary's campus), Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.
London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research · GBCentral University of Venezuela · VELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNew York Blood Center · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

PROTECTIVE IMMUNITY IN HUMANS AGAINST O VOLVULUS LARVAER01AI042328 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI LUSTIGMAN, SARA · 1998 to 2001
$773k
Medical Research Council G0700837Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control has proposed provisional thresholds for the prevalence of microfilariae in humans and of L3 larvae in blackflies, below which mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin can be stopped and surveillance started. Skin snips are currently the gold standard test for detecting patent Onchocerca volvulus infection, and the World Health Organization recommends their use to monitor progress of treatment programmes (but not to verify elimination). However, if they are used (in transition and in parallel to Ov-16 serology), sampling protocols should be designed to demonstrate that programmatic goals have been reached. The sensitivity of skin snips is key to the design of such protocols.

methodsWe develop a mathematical model for the number of microfilariae in a skin snip and parameterise it using data from Guatemala, Venezuela, Ghana and Cameroon collected before the start of ivermectin treatment programmes. We use the model to estimate sensitivity as a function of time since last treatment, number of snips taken, microfilarial aggregation and female worm fertility after exposure to 10 annual rounds of ivermectin treatment.

resultsThe sensitivity of the skin snip method increases with time after treatment, with most of the increase occurring between 0 and 5 years. One year after the last treatment, the sensitivity of two skin snips taken from an individual infected with a single fertile female worm is 31 % if there is no permanent effect of multiple ivermectin treatments on fertility; 18 % if there is a 7 % reduction per treatment, and 0.6 % if there is a 35 % reduction. At 5 years, the corresponding sensitivities are 76 %, 62 % and 4.7 %. The sensitivity improves significantly if 4 skin snips are taken: in the absence of a permanent effect of ivermectin, the sensitivity of 4 skin snips is 53 % 1 year and 94 % 5 years after the last treatment.

conclusionsOur model supports the timelines proposed by APOC for post-MDA follow-up and surveillance surveys every 3-5 years. Two skin snips from the iliac region have reasonable sensitivity to detect residual infection, but the sensitivity can be significantly improved by taking 4 snips. The costs and benefits of using four versus two snips should be evaluated.

Indexed as

AnimalsCameroonFemaleGhanaGuatemalaHumansIvermectinNeglected DiseasesOnchocerca volvulusOnchocerciasisPopulation SurveillanceSensitivity and SpecificitySkinVenezuelaIvermectinDiagnosticsEliminationIvermectinOnchocerciasisPrevalenceSensitivitySkin snipsSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID27301567
PMCPMC4908809
OpenAlexW2424370156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.