ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2017
CHADS
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rationale and design of the BAYES (Interatrial Block and Yearly Events) registry.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- Bayes Syndrome and Myocardial Fibrosis: Mechanistic Links and Clinical Implications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- How antithrombotic therapy influences the clinical outcomes of emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of HIV risk assessment tools for identifying pre-exposure prophylaxis candidates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- The effect of anticoagulation therapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive major gastrointestinal surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Screening for severe coronary stenosis in patients with apparently normal electrocardiograms based on deep learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- NaV1.5 autoantibodies in Brugada syndrome: pathogenetic implications.European heart journal · 2024Article
- Edge AI Model Deployed for Real-Time Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Risk during Sinus Rhythm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Deep learning unmasks the ECG signature of Brugada syndrome.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Machine Learning in Cardiology: A Potential Real-World Solution in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Review
- CHA2DS2-VASc score, P-wave indexes, and echocardiographic parameters in sinus rhythm patients without valvular heart disease.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Article
- An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for identifying ventricular premature contraction during sinus rhythm.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Machine learning aids clinical decision-making in patients presenting with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021Article
- A Case of Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma - An Increasingly Described Cardiac Tumor with Fatal Consequences.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2021Article
- Bayés' Syndrome-A Comprehensive Short Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Review
- Beyond CHAEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
- Detection of Left Atrial Enlargement Using a Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Electrocardiogram.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Second-degree interatrial block: Brief review and concept.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2018Review
- Intra- and interatrial conduction abnormalities: hemodynamic and arrhythmic significance.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the role of CHADS
methodsA retrospective study was conducted, including 1,046 non-anticoagulated inpatients (612 males, 434 females; mean age: 63±10 years) with IAB and without AF. IAB was defined as P-wave duration ＞120 ms using a 12-lead electrocardiogram. CHADS
resultsDuring the mean follow-up period of 4.9±0.7 years, 55 (5.3%) patients had an ischemic stroke or TIA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the CHADS
conclusionsCHADS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.