Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27301407›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2017

Conditioned taste aversions: From poisons to pain to drugs of abuse.

Jian-You Lin, Joe Arthurs, Steve Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. What can we teach Lymnaea and what can Lymnaea teach us?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jian-You LinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. jlin2@uic.edu.
Joe ArthursDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Steve ReillyDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. sreilly@uic.edu.

Funding

Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in CTAR01DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2004 to 2020
$3.9M
Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in Conditioned Taste AversionR56DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2009
$339k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006456NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC006456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning what to eat and what not to eat is fundamental to our well-being, quality of life, and survival. In particular, the acquisition of conditioned taste aversions (CTAs) protects all animals (including humans) against ingesting foods that contain poisons or toxins. Counterintuitively, CTAs can also develop in situations in which we know with absolute certainty that the food did not cause the subsequent aversive systemic effect. Recent nonhuman animal research, analyzing palatability shifts, has indicated that a wider range of stimuli than has been traditionally acknowledged can induce CTAs. This article integrates these new findings with a reappraisal of some known characteristics of CTA and presents a novel conceptual analysis that is broader and more comprehensive than previous accounts of CTA learning.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalIllicit DrugsPoisonsTasteAnimalsAssociation LearningChildConditioning, OperantCuesFood PreferencesHumansMaleMental RecallPainQuality of LifeIllicit DrugsPoisonsConditioned taste aversionFalse positivesPalatabilityTaste neophobia

Identifiers

PMID27301407
PMCPMC5857059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.