Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27301373›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors.

Angelo Iossa, Mohamed Abdelgawad, Brad Michael Watkins, Gianfranco Silecchia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Improving Hemostasis in Sleeve Gastrectomy With Alternative Stapler.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Angelo IossaDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence, La Sapienza University of Rome, Via F. Faggiana 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy. angelo.iossa@gmail.com.
Mohamed AbdelgawadDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence, La Sapienza University of Rome, Via F. Faggiana 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy.
Brad Michael WatkinsDivision of General Surgery and Weight loss Center, West Chester Hospital, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Gianfranco SilecchiaDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence, La Sapienza University of Rome, Via F. Faggiana 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeak is the second most common cause of death after bariatric surgery. The leak rate after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) ranges between 1.1 and 5.3 %. The aim of the paper is to provide an overview of the current pathogenic and promoting factors of leakage after LSG on the basis of recent literature review and to report the evidence based preventive measures.

methodsRisk factors and pathogenesis of leakage after LSG were examined based on an extensive review of literature and evidence based analysis of the most recent published studies using Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine, 2011, levels of evidence.

resultsPathogenesis of leakage after LSG can be attributed to mechanical or ischemic causes. Many factors can predispose to leakage after LSG which are either technically related or patient related. Awareness of these predisposing factors and technical tips may decrease the incidence of leakage.

conclusionsThis review reports factors promoting leak and gives technical recommendations to avoid leak after LSG based on the available evidence and expert consensus which encompasses: (1) use a bougie size ≥40 Fr, EL:1, (2) begin the gastric transection 5-6 cm from the pylorus, EL:2-3, (3) use appropriate cartridge colors from antrum to fundus, EL:1, (4) reinforce the staple line with buttress material, EL:1, (5) follow a proper staple line, (6) remove the crotch staples, EL:4, (7) maintain proper traction on the stomach before firing, (8) stay away from the angle of His at least 1 cm, EL:1, (9) check the bleeding from the staple line, (10) perform an intraoperative methylene blue test, EL:4.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyRisk FactorsFistulaIdeal sleeve gastrectomyLeakPathogenesisTechnical tips

Identifiers

PMID27301373
OpenAlexW2430180722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.