ArticleIRB
Community-Engaged Research Ethics Review: Exploring Flexibility in Federal Regulations.
Article in IRB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot feasibility of a financial and health-related social needs navigation intervention (AYA-NAV) for adolescents and young adults with Cancer: Study protocol for a prospective, single-arm study.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Institutional community engagement leader perspectives on supporting ethical community-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022Article
- Just Research: Advancing Antiracist and Antioppressive Social Work Research.Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · 2022Article
- Ethical Challenges in Promoting the Implementation of Preventive Interventions: Report of the SPR Task Force.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27301168PMC4997782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.