Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27300548›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2016

Docetaxel-related toxicity in metastatic hormone-sensitive and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Michael T Schweizer, Roman Gulati, Elahe A Mostaghel, Peter S Nelson, R Bruce Montgomery, Evan Y Yu, Heather H Cheng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03863145 (Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Maximum Tolerated Dose of Orally Administered CB-03-10 With Dose Expansion Phase, in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03863145 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Maximum Tolerated Dose of Orally Administered CB-03-10 With Dose Expansion Phase, in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorCosmo Technologies LtdRan2022 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsAdvanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Subjects Considered Likely to Respond to CB-03-10ArmsCB-03-10
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael T SchweizerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. schweize@uw.edu.
Roman GulatiDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Elahe A MostaghelDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Peter S NelsonDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
R Bruce MontgomeryDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Evan Y YuDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Heather H ChengDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

Funding

TRANSCRIPTOME AND PROTEOME STRATIFICATION OF PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA PHENOTYPESP50CA097186 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI John Kyung Lee · 2002 to 2026
$58.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) offers a survival benefit in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, one trial evaluating docetaxel in mHSPC (GETUG-AFU15) showed unexpected toxicity; raising concerns that docetaxel may carry increased toxicity when used to treat mHSPC compared to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted a retrospective analysis evaluating differences in toxicity based on the clinical state (i.e., mHSPC vs. mCRPC) that docetaxel was used. Patients initiating docetaxel between 1/1/2014 and 7/15/2015 were included, with the former date chosen to coincide with the press release for the first mHSPC study that showed a survival benefit with early docetaxel; ensuring contemporary docetaxel-treated cohorts. Thirty-nine mCRPC and 22 mHSPC patients were included. Compared to mCRPC, mHSPC patients were younger (median years: 66.3 vs. 71.8, P = 0.007); had better performance status (ECOG 0-1: 100 vs. 62 %, P < 0.0001); and used opiates less frequently (29 vs. 66 %, P = 0.04). Neutropenic fevers occurred in 9 and 5 % (P = 0.95) of men with mHSPC and mCRPC, respectively. Other toxicities also occurred at similar rates between cohorts. The incidence of any toxic event was 73 and 67 % (P = 0.84) for men with mHSPC and mCRPC, respectively. Within the mHSPC cohort, neutropenic fevers occurred at a similar rate regardless of the time interval between initiating ADT and the start of docetaxel. We did not observe a significant difference in toxicity between mHSPC and mCRPC patients receiving docetaxel. However, the small sample size and retrospective nature of this study limit our ability to draw definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRetrospective StudiesTaxoidsAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelTaxoidsAdverse eventCastration-resistantDocetaxelHormone-sensitiveNeutropeniaNeutropenic feverProstate cancerToxicity

Identifiers

PMID27300548
PMCPMC5298886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.