Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27299960›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

The relationship between tumour budding, the tumour microenvironment and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer.

Hester C van Wyk, James H Park, Joanne Edwards, Paul G Horgan, Donald C McMillan, James J Going

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic Impact of Tumor Budding on Moroccan Colon Cancer Patients.International journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tumour-associated neutrophils in patients with cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hester C van WykAcademic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences, University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
James H ParkAcademic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences, University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
Joanne EdwardsUnit of Experimental Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Paul G HorganAcademic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences, University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
Donald C McMillanAcademic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences, University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
James J GoingUniversity Department of Pathology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences, University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBSouthern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumour budding has been reported to reflect invasiveness, metastasis and unfavourable prognosis in colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between tumour budding and clinicopathological characteristics, tumour microenvironment and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer.

methodsA total of 303 patients from a prospective data set of patients with primary operable colorectal cancer were included in the study. The presence of budding was determined through assessment of all tumour-containing H&E slides and the number of tumour buds was counted using a 10 high-powered field method. Routine pathologic sections were used to assess: tumour necrosis, the tumour inflammatory cell infiltrate using Klintrup-Makinen (KM) grade and tumour stroma percentage (TSP) combined as the Glasgow Microenvironment Score (GMS).

resultsHigh-grade tumour budding was present in 39% of all tumours and in 28% of node-negative tumours respectively. High-grade budding was significantly associated with T stage (P<0.001), N stage (P<0.001), TNM stage (P<0.001), serosal involvement (P<0.001), venous invasion (P<0.005), KM grade (P=0.022), high tumour stroma (P<0.001) and GMS (P<0.001). Tumour budding was associated with reduced cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR=4.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.50-6.52; P<0.001), independent of age (HR=1.47; 95% CI, 1.13-1.90; P=0.004), TNM stage (HR=1.52; 95% CI, 1.02-2.25; P=0.040), venous invasion (HR=1.73; 95% CI, 1.13-2.64; P=0.012) and GMS (HR=1.54; 95% CI, 1.15-2.07; P=0.004).

conclusionsThe presence of tumour budding was associated with elements of the tumour microenvironment and was an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Specifically high tumour budding stratifies effectively the prognostic value of tumour stage, venous invasion and GMS. Taken together, tumour budding should be assessed routinely in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID27299960
PMCPMC4947698
OpenAlexW2438208391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.