Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27299938›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2016

Systems Pharmacology Modeling of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With an Androgen Receptor Antagonist and Down-Regulator.

H B Mistry, M-A Fabre, J Young, G Clack, P A Dickinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H B MistryManchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, UK.
M-A FabreQuantitiative Clinical Pharmacology, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK.
J YoungGoosebrook Associates Ltd, The BioHub at Alderley Park Alderley Edge, UK.
G ClackEarly Clinical Development, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK.
P A DickinsonSeda Pharmaceutical Development Services, The BioHub at Alderley Park Alderley Edge, UK.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBPixelMill (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First-in-human (FIH) studies with AZD3514, a selective androgen receptor (AR) down-regulator, showed decreases of >30% in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in some patients. A modeling approach was adopted to understand these observations and define the optimum clinical use hypothesis for AZD3514 for clinical testing. Initial empirical modeling showed that only baseline PSA correlated significantly with this biological response, whereas drug concentration did not. To identify the mechanistic cause of this observation, a mechanism-based model was first developed, which described the effects of AZD3514 on AR protein and PSA mRNA levels in LNCaP cells with and without dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Second, the mechanism-based model was linked to a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model; PSA effects of clinical doses were subsequently simulated under different clinical conditions. This model was used to adjust the design of the ongoing clinical FIH study and direct the backup program.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSystems AnalysisAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsDown-RegulationHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantPyridazinesReceptors, AndrogenTreatment OutcomeAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAR protein, humanAZD3514Prostate-Specific AntigenPyridazinesReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID27299938
PMCPMC4879474
OpenAlexW2404688377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.