Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27299853›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016

Predicting the Risk of Readmission in Pneumonia. A Systematic Review of Model Performance.

Mark Weinreich, Oanh K Nguyen, David Wang, Helen Mayo, Eric M Mortensen, Ethan A Halm, Anil N Makam

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current Trends in Readmission Prediction: An Overview of Approaches.Arabian journal for science and engineering · 2021
    Article
  19. Predicting the 14-Day Hospital Readmission of Patients with Pneumonia Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark Weinreich1 Department of Internal Medicine.
Oanh K Nguyen1 Department of Internal Medicine.
David Wang1 Department of Internal Medicine.
Helen Mayo3 Health Sciences Digital Library and Learning Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and.
Eric M Mortensen1 Department of Internal Medicine.
Ethan A Halm1 Department of Internal Medicine.
Anil N Makam1 Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-9946

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
UT Southwestern Center of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR)R24HS022418 · AHRQ · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALM, ETHAN A · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1KL2TR001103 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022418NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001103NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePredicting which patients are at highest risk for readmission after hospitalization for pneumonia could enable hospitals to proactively reallocate scarce resources to reduce 30-day readmissions.

objectivesTo synthesize the available literature on readmission risk prediction models for adults who are hospitalized because of pneumonia and describe their performance.

methodsWe systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases from inception through July 2015. We included studies of adults discharged with pneumonia that developed or validated a model that predicted hospital readmission. Two independent reviewers abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 992 citations reviewed, 7 studies met inclusion criteria, which included 11 unique risk prediction models. All-cause 30-day readmission rates ranged from 11.8 to 20.8% (median, 17.3%). Model discrimination (C statistic) ranged from 0.59 to 0.77 (median, 0.63) with the highest-quality, best-validated model, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Pneumonia Administrative Model performing modestly (C Statistic of 0.63 in 4 separate multicenter cohorts). The best performing model (C statistic of 0.77) was a single-site study that lacked internal validation. The models had adequate calibration, with patients predicted as high risk for readmission having a higher average observed readmission rate than those predicted to be low risk. None of the studies included pneumonia illness severity scores, and only one included measures of in-hospital clinical trajectory and stability on discharge, robust predictors of readmission.

conclusionsWe found a limited number of validated pneumonia-specific readmission models, and their predictive ability was modest. To improve predictive accuracy, future models should include measures of pneumonia illness severity, hospital complications, and stability on discharge.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.HumansPatient ReadmissionPneumoniaPrognosisRisk AssessmentTime FactorsUnited Statesmodelpatient readmissionpneumoniapredictionrisk

Identifiers

PMID27299853
PMCPMC5059500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.