Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27299213›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2016

Longitudinal Relationship Between Sitting Time on a Working Day and Vitality, Work Performance, Presenteeism, and Sickness Absence.

Ingrid J M Hendriksen, Claire M Bernaards, Wouter M P Steijn, Vincent H Hildebrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Worldwide surveillance of self-reported sitting time: a scoping review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingrid J M HendriksenExpertise Centre Lifestyle, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden (Drs Hendriksen, Bernaards, Hildebrandt); Body@Work Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health TNO-VU/VUmc, Amsterdam (Drs Hendriksen, Bernaards, Hildebrandt); and Department of Urban Environment and Safety, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands (Dr Steijn).
Claire M Bernaards
Wouter M P Steijn
Vincent H Hildebrandt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the longitudinal relationship between sitting time on a working day and vitality, work performance, presenteeism, and sickness absence.

methodsAt the start and end of a five-month intervention program at the workplace, as well as 10 months after the intervention, sitting time and work-related outcomes were measured using a standardized self-administered questionnaire and company records. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the longitudinal relationship between sitting time and work-related outcomes, and possible interaction effects over time.

resultsA significant and sustainable decrease in sitting time on a working day was observed. Sitting less was significantly related to higher vitality scores, but this effect was marginal (b = -0.0006, P = 0.000).

conclusionsOur finding of significant though marginal associations between sitting time and important work-related outcomes justifies further research.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismPosturePresenteeismWork PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID27299213
PMCPMC4961272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.