Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27298752›Full record

ArticleScientifica2016

Construction of Gene Regulatory Networks Using Recurrent Neural Networks and Swarm Intelligence.

Abhinandan Khan, Sudip Mandal, Rajat Kumar Pal, Goutam Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abhinandan KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Roy Siksha Prangan, JD-2, Sector III, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 098, India.
Sudip MandalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Roy Siksha Prangan, JD-2, Sector III, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 098, India.
Rajat Kumar PalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Roy Siksha Prangan, JD-2, Sector III, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 098, India.
Goutam SahaDepartment of Information Technology, North Eastern Hill University, Umshing-Mawkynroh, Shillong, Meghalaya 793 022, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have proposed a methodology for the reverse engineering of biologically plausible gene regulatory networks from temporal genetic expression data. We have used established information and the fundamental mathematical theory for this purpose. We have employed the Recurrent Neural Network formalism to extract the underlying dynamics present in the time series expression data accurately. We have introduced a new hybrid swarm intelligence framework for the accurate training of the model parameters. The proposed methodology has been first applied to a small artificial network, and the results obtained suggest that it can produce the best results available in the contemporary literature, to the best of our knowledge. Subsequently, we have implemented our proposed framework on experimental (in vivo) datasets. Finally, we have investigated two medium sized genetic networks (in silico) extracted from GeneNetWeaver, to understand how the proposed algorithm scales up with network size. Additionally, we have implemented our proposed algorithm with half the number of time points. The results indicate that a reduction of 50% in the number of time points does not have an effect on the accuracy of the proposed methodology significantly, with a maximum of just over 15% deterioration in the worst case.

Identifiers

PMID27298752
PMCPMC4889854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.