Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27298730›Full record

ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2016

The timing of umbilical cord clamping at birth: physiological considerations.

Stuart B Hooper, Corinna Binder-Heschl, Graeme R Polglase, Andrew W Gill, Martin Kluckow, Euan M Wallace, Douglas Blank, Arjan B Te Pas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04052984 (Delayed Cord Clamping and Early Skin-to-skin Contact in Cesarean Section as Interventions That Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04052984 nacompletednot on this map

Delayed Cord Clamping and Early Skin-to-skin Contact in Cesarean Section as Interventions That Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsociacion Mexicana de Nacimiento Respetado, A.C.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled48ConditionsBreastfeeding, ExclusiveArmsDelayed umbilical clamping and immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth by caesarean section
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Placental transfusion in preterm neonates of 30-33 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. South African midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Maternal implications of placental transfusion.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effect of breathing on venous return during delayed cord clamping: an observational study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2022
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Respiratory support after delayed cord clamping: a prospective cohort study of at-risk births at ≥35Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stuart B HooperThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Corinna Binder-HeschlThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Graeme R PolglaseThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew W GillCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6008 Australia.
Martin KluckowDepartment of Neonatology, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065 Australia.
Euan M WallaceThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Douglas BlankThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia ; Neonatal Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Arjan B Te PasDepartment of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AULeiden University · NLMonash University · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Facilitating The Physiological Transition at Birth In Term And Preterm NeonatesR01HD072848 · NICHD · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PETER GRAHAM, HOOPER, STUART · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is now recognized that umbilical cord clamping (UCC) at birth is not necessarily an innocuous act, there is still much confusion concerning the potential benefits and harms of this common procedure. It is most commonly assumed that delaying UCC will automatically result in a time-dependent net placental-to-infant blood transfusion, irrespective of the infant's physiological state. Whether or not this occurs, will likely depend on the infant's physiological state and not on the amount of time that has elapsed between birth and umbilical cord clamping (UCC). However, we believe that this is an overly simplistic view of what can occur during delayed UCC and ignores the benefits associated with maintaining the infant's venous return and cardiac output during transition. Recent experimental evidence and observations in humans have provided compelling evidence to demonstrate that time is not a major factor influencing placental-to-infant blood transfusion after birth. Indeed, there are many factors that influence blood flow in the umbilical vessels after birth, which depending on the dominating factors could potentially result in infant-to-placental blood transfusion. The most dominant factors that influence umbilical artery and venous blood flows after birth are lung aeration, spontaneous inspirations, crying and uterine contractions. It is still not entirely clear whether gravity differentially alters umbilical artery and venous flows, although the available data suggests that its influence, if present, is minimal. While there is much support for delaying UCC at birth, much of the debate has focused on a time-based approach, which we believe is misguided. While a time-based approach is much easier and convenient for the caregiver, ignoring the infant's physiology during delayed UCC can potentially be counter-productive for the infant.

Indexed as

BirthDelayed umbilical cord clampingNeonatal cardiovascular transitionUmbilical artery flowUmbilical venous flow

Identifiers

PMID27298730
PMCPMC4904360
OpenAlexW2408931817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.