Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27298590›Full record

ReviewJournal of carcinogenesis2016

The well-accepted notion that gene amplification contributes to increased expression still remains, after all these years, a reasonable but unproven assumption.

Yuping Jia, Lichan Chen, Qingwen Jia, Xixi Dou, Ningzhi Xu, Dezhong Joshua Liao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A pan-cancer analysis of pituitary tumor-transforming 3, pseudogene.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuping JiaAnimal Facilities, Shandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ji'nan, Shandong 250101, USA.
Lichan ChenHormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN 55912, USA.
Qingwen JiaAnimal Facilities, Shandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ji'nan, Shandong 250101, USA.
Xixi DouAnimal Facilities, Shandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ji'nan, Shandong 250101, USA.
Ningzhi XuLaboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100021, China.
Dezhong Joshua LiaoDepartment of Pathology, Guizhou Medical University Hospital, Guizhou, Guiyang 550004, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Gene amplification causes overexpression" is a longstanding and well-accepted concept in cancer genetics. However, raking the whole literature, we find only statistical analyses showing a positive correlation between gene copy number and expression level, but do not find convincing experimental corroboration for this notion, for most of the amplified oncogenes in cancers. Since an association does not need to be an actual causal relation, in our opinion, this widespread notion still remains a reasonable but unproven assumption awaiting experimental verification.

Indexed as

Cancergene amplificationoverexpressiontranslocation

Identifiers

PMID27298590
PMCPMC4895059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.