Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27298375›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome reflects an expansion in glycan recognition.

Immacolata Venditto, Ana S Luis, Maja Rydahl, Julia Schückel, Vânia O Fernandes, Silvia Vidal-Melgosa, Pedro Bule, Arun Goyal, Virginia M R Pires, Catarina G Dourado and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Unique Fn3-like biosensor in σProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Building an extensible cell wall.Plant physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Immacolata VendittoInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal; Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
Ana S LuisInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal; Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
Maja RydahlDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
Julia SchückelDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
Vânia O FernandesInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal; NZYTech Genes & Enzymes, Campus do Lumiar, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal;
Silvia Vidal-MelgosaDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
Pedro BuleInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal;
Arun GoyalDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India;
Virginia M R PiresInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal;
Catarina G DouradoInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal;
Luís M A FerreiraInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal; NZYTech Genes & Enzymes, Campus do Lumiar, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal;
Pedro M CoutinhoArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, UMR 7857 CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, F-13288 Marseille, France;
Bernard HenrissatArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, UMR 7857 CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, F-13288 Marseille, France; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, USC 1408 Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, F-13288 Marseille, France, Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;
J Paul KnoxCentre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Arnaud BasléInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
Shabir NajmudinInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal;
Harry J GilbertInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom; cafontes@fmv.ulisboa.pt willats@plen.ku.dk harry.gilbert@ncl.ac.uk.
William G T WillatsDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; cafontes@fmv.ulisboa.pt willats@plen.ku.dk harry.gilbert@ncl.ac.uk.
Carlos M G A FontesInterdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal; NZYTech Genes & Enzymes, Campus do Lumiar, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal; cafontes@fmv.ulisboa.pt willats@plen.ku.dk harry.gilbert@ncl.ac.uk.
University of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Copenhagen · DKNewcastle University · GBArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques · FRIndian Institute of Technology Guwahati · INUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breakdown of plant cell wall (PCW) glycans is an important biological and industrial process. Noncatalytic carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs) fulfill a critical targeting function in PCW depolymerization. Defining the portfolio of CBMs, the CBMome, of a PCW degrading system is central to understanding the mechanisms by which microbes depolymerize their target substrates. Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a major PCW degrading bacterium, assembles its catalytic apparatus into a large multienzyme complex, the cellulosome. Significantly, bioinformatic analyses of the R. flavefaciens cellulosome failed to identify a CBM predicted to bind to crystalline cellulose, a key feature of the CBMome of other PCW degrading systems. Here, high throughput screening of 177 protein modules of unknown function was used to determine the complete CBMome of R. flavefaciens The data identified six previously unidentified CBM families that targeted β-glucans, β-mannans, and the pectic polysaccharide homogalacturonan. The crystal structures of four CBMs, in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis, provide insight into the mechanism of ligand recognition. In the CBMs that recognize β-glucans and β-mannans, differences in the conformation of conserved aromatic residues had a significant impact on the topology of the ligand binding cleft and thus ligand specificity. A cluster of basic residues in CBM77 confers calcium-independent recognition of homogalacturonan, indicating that the carboxylates of galacturonic acid are key specificity determinants. This report shows that the extended repertoire of proteins in the cellulosome of R. flavefaciens contributes to an extended CBMome that supports efficient PCW degradation in the absence of CBMs that specifically target crystalline cellulose.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCellulosomesCrystallography, X-RayModels, MolecularPolysaccharidesProtein BindingRuminococcusBacterial ProteinsPolysaccharidescarbohydrate active enZYmescarbohydrate-binding modulescellulosomesprotein-carbohydrate interactions

Identifiers

PMID27298375
PMCPMC4932953
OpenAlexW2424858917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.