ArticleNeuro-oncology2016
Clinical parameters outweigh diffusion- and perfusion-derived MRI parameters in predicting survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Abstract read
In one paragraph
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Baseline pretreatment contrast enhancing tumor volume including central necrosis is a prognostic factor in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from single and multicenter trials.Neuro-oncology · 2017Trial
- Higher cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI is an independent predictor of poor survival in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Dynamic susceptibility contrast‑enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging parameters for predictingOncology letters · 2024Article
- Cluster-based prognostication in glioblastoma: Unveiling heterogeneity based on diffusion and perfusion similarities.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1/2 Wildtype Adult Astrocytoma with WHO Grade 2/3 Histological Features: Molecular Re-Classification, Prognostic Factors, Clinical Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Association of ADC of hyperintense lesions on FLAIR images with TERT promoter mutation status in glioblastoma IDH wild type.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Evaluation of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in 2021 world health organization classification grade 3 and 4 glioma adult-type diffuse gliomas with 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary Adult Brain Tumors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Perfusion MR prior to radiotherapy is a strong predictor of survival in high-grade gliomas after proton and carbon ion radiotherapy.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Peritumoral Lesion Associate with Recurrence in Patients with Glioblastoma.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2022Article
- Sex-Specific Differences in Glioblastoma.Cells · 2021Review
- Review
- Predicting Survival in Glioblastoma Patients Using Diffusion MR Imaging Metrics-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2020Review
- Overall survival prediction in glioblastoma patients using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): advanced radiomic features may compensate for lack of advanced MRI modalities.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Article
- Relaxation-compensated amide proton transfer (APT) MRI signal intensity is associated with survival and progression in high-grade glioma patients.European radiology · 2019Article
- Multi-parametric and multi-regional histogram analysis of MRI: modality integration reveals imaging phenotypes of glioblastoma.European radiology · 2019Article
- Combining multimodal imaging and treatment features improves machine learning-based prognostic assessment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Probing tumor microenvironment in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma during chemoradiation and adjuvant temozolomide with functional MRI.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Sina BurthDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Philipp KickingerederDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Oliver EidelDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Diana TichyDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
David BonekampDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Lukas WeberlingDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Antje WickDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Sarah LöwDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Anne HertensteinDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Martha NowosielskiDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Wolfgang WickDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Alexander RadbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B., P.K., O.E., D.B., L.W., M.B., A.R.); Division of Bioststatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (D.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.W., S.L., A.H., W.W.); Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (M.N.); Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (H.S.).
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the relevance of clinical data, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion and the volume transfer constant (k
methodsPreoperative MR scans including standardized contrast-enhanced T1 (cT1), T2 - fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), ADC, DSC, and DCE of 125 patients with subsequent histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma were performed on a 3 Tesla MRI scanner. ADC, DSC, and DCE parameters were analyzed in semiautomatically segmented tumor volumes on contrast-enhanced (CE) cT1 and hyperintense signal changes on T2 FLAIR (ED). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses including age, sex, extent of resection (EOR), and KPS were performed to assess the influence of each parameter on OS and PFS.
resultsUnivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association of age, KPS, and EOR with PFS and age, KPS, EOR, lower ADC, and higher rCBV with OS. Multivariable analysis showed independent significance of male sex, KPS, EOR, and increased rCBV
conclusionsMRI parameters help to predict OS in a univariate Cox regression analysis, and increased rCBV
Indexed as
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAdultAgedBrainBrain NeoplasmsCerebral Blood VolumeContrast MediaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediadiffusionglioblastomaMRIperfusionsurvival
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.