ArticleComparative medicine2016
Scratching Responses to Epidermal Injury in C57BL/6, DBA/2, BALB/c, and CD1 Mice.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whereas early investigations into ulcerative dermatitis (UD) focused on the possibility of a primary dermatopathology, several recent studies have advocated scratching behavior as a primary driver for UD. The aim of this study was to assess whether B6 mice exhibit excessive scratching under resting conditions or when provoked by epidermal barrier disruption. We hypothesized that B6 mice would exhibit more spontaneous scratching behavior and that B6 mice would be more pruritic after mild epidermal barrier injury compared with the other strains and stock tested. The behavior of the retired breeder female C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, BALB/cByJ, and Crl:CD1 mice was videotaped for 60 min. Behavior filming occurred at 17:15 and at 07:00 the next morning prior to (baseline) and after tape-stripping to initiate epidermal barrier disruption. Scratching duration was recorded as brief (less than 3 s) or prolonged (3 s or longer), on the basis of observations during a pilot study. In contrast to the hypothesis, B6 mice did not scratch significantly more frequently, have more long-duration scratching events, nor have a higher median scratching duration of prolonged scratching as compared with the other types of mice tested. In fact, B6 mice showed the lowest average scratching frequency and duration under both conditions. B6 mice demonstrated increased scratching behavior after epidermal barrier disruption, but the increased scratching did not surpass the rate or duration of scratching in the other types of mice tested. These findings do not support the idea that a strain-related tendency toward exaggerated scratching behavior under resting or epidermal barrier disruption conditions predisposes B6 mice to UD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27298245PMC4907529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.