Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27298233›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2016

Self-control assessments of capuchin monkeys with the rotating tray task and the accumulation task.

Michael J Beran, Bonnie M Perdue, Mattea S Rossettie, Brielle T James, Will Whitham, Bradlyn Walker, Sara E Futch, Audrey E Parrish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Self-control in crows, parrots and nonhuman primates.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael J BeranDepartment of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, United States. Electronic address: mjberan@yahoo.com.
Bonnie M PerdueDepartment of Psychology, Agnes Scott College, United States.
Mattea S RossettieLanguage Research Center, Georgia State University, United States.
Brielle T JamesDepartment of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, United States.
Will WhithamDepartment of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, United States.
Bradlyn WalkerDepartment of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, United States.
Sara E FutchDepartment of Psychology, Wofford College, United States.
Audrey E ParrishDepartment of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, United States.

Funding

The Emergence of Self-Control: Comparative Beh. and Neurobiological AssessmentsP01HD060563 · NICHD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WASHBURN, DAVID A · 2010 to 2014
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD060563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of delay of gratification in capuchin monkeys using a rotating tray (RT) task have shown improved self-control performance in these animals in comparison to the accumulation (AC) task. In this study, we investigated whether this improvement resulted from the difference in methods between the rotating tray task and previous tests, or whether it was the result of greater overall experience with delay of gratification tasks. Experiment 1 produced similar performance levels by capuchins monkeys in the RT and AC tasks when identical reward and temporal parameters were used. Experiment 2 demonstrated a similar result using reward amounts that were more similar to previous AC experiments with these monkeys. In Experiment 3, monkeys performed multiple versions of the AC task with varied reward and temporal parameters. Their self-control behavior was found to be dependent on the overall delay to reward consumption, rather than the overall reward amount ultimately consumed. These findings indicate that these capuchin monkeys' self-control capacities were more likely to have improved across studies because of the greater experience they had with delay of gratification tasks. Experiment 4 and Experiment 5 tested new, task-naïve monkeys on both tasks, finding more limited evidence of self-control, and no evidence that one task was more beneficial than the other in promoting self-control. The results of this study suggest that future testing of this kind should focus on temporal parameters and reward magnitude parameters to establish accurate measures of delay of gratification capacity and development in this species and perhaps others.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorRewardSelf-ControlAnimalsCebusFemaleMaleTime FactorsAccumulation taskCapuchin monkeysDelay of gratificationRotating tray taskSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID27298233
PMCPMC4939108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.